Why are women so quick to assume anyone accused of rape is guilty unless they can prove consent, yet as soon as the woman admits it was made up (or the evidence disproves her story) suddenly women look the other way?

A woman can drag a guy's name (and, thus, his entire life) through the mud with a rape allegation - but if it's proven false then she's not even subject to a slap on the wrist, whereas the guy gets a page 12 retraction (if that) and women suspiciously insist 'I still think he did it', just like with this UVA story.

The reason so many men lately are hesitant to jump on the guilty-until-proven-innocent rape accusation bandwagon is because of cases like this (and let's not pretend false accusations are some rare unicorn virtually unheard of).

Regrettable sex does not equal rape. If you let 2 guys fuck you on Tuesday, but by Friday you're so sick with yourself for allowing it to happen that you decide you were raped: you're awful. Because you can't accept that you made a bad decision, you're going to ruin other people's lives?

My best friend's cousin was falsely accused of rape. Months later, the accuser and her mom went to the police station at 2am months later to confess the rape never happened and the accusation was made because he cheated on her and she wanted to hurt him. Just last month, a WA woman admitted that the man who had spent over 20 years behind bars never raped her.

My dick isn't the problem. Your credibility is.