Comments

1
Take that, New York!
2
Too bad ours now takes an extra 45 minutes to arrive at the actual stops. In fact, I'd ditch the whole "cell-phone-blah-blah" aspect just to get a slightly more frequent bus, now and then.

3
@toilet joe: For the cost of what they spent on the "cell-phone-blah-blah" they would be able to increase frequency by around 0.2%, for one year. Meaning if the route sucks because the density is too low and it serves f$^&ing Dumbasskiss, (is that Dumbass Kiss, or Dumb Asskiss?) and so it only makes sense to run it once an hour at rush hour in the first place, it would be able to run every 59 minutes and 54 seconds instead. For that year. Then they'd go back to no "cell-phone-blah-blah" and still only run every hour.
4
Exactly, Trimet isn't making (spending money on) any of the cell phone blah blahs. They have made the data available, and independent programmers are using the data to make the blah blahs. "How did Portland become a transit technology pioneer without spending a dime?"

Also, Mirk, what's a computer science power couple? Is that some sort of kickass server config, or is it two people who are in a relationship and are doing the programming for Trimet?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.