Comments

1
Seriously, you folks (Mirk in particular, I suspect) need to stop whining about how hard it is for you to look things up on a computer.

Did you know that anyone with a library card can freely access (and easily search) the recent years of the Oregonian by using the Multnomah County Library's link to Newsbank? Many grade school children have learned to use the magic and muysterious library to access info, but I will make it easy for you cause you may have missed that fifth grade field trip. Go to: http://www.multcolib.org/ref/a2z.html Look under O for Oregonian. (The letter O comes after the letter N)



I am surprised the O itself doesn't doa quick search of its archives when an incident like the campbell shooting involves specific, named, officers. So good work on following up.


2
"did not create a hostile workplace"

If your usual workplace is a high school baseball team.
3
I don't think they're complaining about the difficulty of accessing things by the 'net so much as how poorly a number of these websites are designed -- a big flaw in sites that are supposed to be used by the very lowest common denominator of internet users (read: government websites).
4
@Number Six:

I suspect the fact that the O has laid off so many reporters may have knocked its institutional memory, somewhat. Nevertheless this is a real glaring oversight. Nobody remembered her name?
5
Ah, public humiilation is so powerful. Do you think anyone has footage of the "Hawaiian night where male members danced in g-strings wearing coconut bras"? And can someone please explain the link between man's man team building exercises and over the top (so to speak) homoerotic behavior?
6
If you have to pay for the archive, is it ethical (or legal) to reproduce the complete articles/letters?

Consider your nit picked.
7
Excuse me? This is the "ELITE" police team? This would be EMBARRASSING if it were a group of High School Students much less our "elite" police force. How would anyone think that calling these bozos would help.

Portland Police, Chief Sizer... Pardon me- but GET it THE EFF TOGETHER... Chasse should have NEVER died for pissing on the street. Damn- why don't you issue the police force "Bad Kitty" water guns; which probably WOULD have worked in this case.

I'm embarrassed not to mention; frightened any time I'm faced with a Portland Police officer. I once had one do an unlawful search & seizure in my OWN home when I was there alone. I was even charged with "disorderly conduct" in my own residence- and the police officer even LIED about it in court over a STUPID sound complaint from a mentally unstable neighbor who "looked" more "normal" than I did. It was TOTAL BULLSHIT... if my other neighbor hadn't taken TIME OFF OF WORK to TESTIFY for me... I would have had a $1,200 dollar fine plus a record. What a dis-service to the city and myself- my neighbor your LAME, SHORT, Ass of a COP whose name I will not mention did. I was even too traumatized by the cop's threats to go and pick up the equipment he confiscated. I wonder HOW many OTHER stories never even get the time of day... Especially when big one's like this don't get the attention or action they deserve.

If your officers are so eager to overlook a person's rights on such a small level- I have to ask myself what they are willing to do when they've got bigger decisions to make.

PPD: you get a FAIL in my book. I feel more comfortable walking down the street lined with drug dealers and prostitutes than being bullied by the likes of you. At least I can deal with them without fearing for my life or being threatened & taken to jail. What ever happened to Officer Friendly, the normal "beat-walking" cop who was on YOUR side?? Instead of making me feel safe- I usually feel fear; what a sad state to have to feel living in Portland, Oregon.

SO LAME. This stinks.

Sincerely-

astrogirl
8
@CH: In this isolated instance I took a judgment call that reproducing the article was more in the public interest than any other concerns. Having said that...

If the O's lawyers want us to pull it down, or link it somewhere else, we'll gladly do it. My first instinct was simply to share the information in an accessible way. But I appreciate your raising the question. We do think about this stuff. Heat of the moment. Quickly unfolding situation. Yadda yadda.
9
These guys sounds really cool. How do I become a part of this outfit?

Seriously though, I am a man, and I can't figure this out. I have been on many sports teams, in locker rooms, gyms, a fraternity, etc. At no time, in any of these male-dominated institutions have I seen anything like this stuff taken place. They go on a retreat together and dance around in thongs, simulate masturbation, and sing YMCA to each other? They sit naked on someone's face?

What the fuck is wrong with these people?
10

Now that I've picked up the broken tea cup and the dog has stopped howling in fright from my exhortations ...

Please disclose from somewhere in the public domain records which Matt C Davis and the MERC - but no other Portland media - have with due diligence exclusively already obtained:

1- the law firms and attorney names of all the parties in the Sergeant Liani Reyna state and 9th circuit cases against the Portland Police Bureau's SERT team?

2- The case numbers of the state and appellate cases?

3- both case numbers please?

4- Final Judgments and orders of both cases?

Is the MERC planning to file MORE public records requests with PPB and City Law Dept to identify current an former woman officers subject to hostile environment and sex bias? (Or does Portland CopWatch know of other cases or women too intimidated to file who decide to quit instead of challenging the thin blue line of command and control?

The facts pled and disclosed so far are not a mere one-off anomaly - the incidents complained of are indicative of 'pack' behavior.

It defies credulity and case law to suppose that an entrenched culture of institutionalized misogyny and homophobia would result in only ONE actionable case of hostile environment gender discrimination.

Matt and Sara's gum-shoe, concrete-pounding, deep throat sourced reporting is meritorious and deserves submission & consideration for national journalism awards.

These, and more, of the dirty little secrets of the PPB really are due ful exposure in a national news or TV magazine story (Democracy NOW, Mother Jones, Atlantic, National Journal, Vanity Fair, 20/20, 60 Minutes). as well as prolific dissemination by the digital truth warriors ...

There can be no more compelling argument needed to justify the necessity for the Mayor of Portland to & immediately do his spin PR thang to commit to conducting a a full-on national search for chief to replace Sizer - as the Mayor of Seattle is currently doing, and by asking citizens for on-line answers to 4 threshold questions formulated by a diverse, 28 person commission that is holding public, video taped neighborhood hearings.

a TWISTED tale of two americana frontier towns ..




11
when I read stuff like this and think of the rumors often told that Rosie bed-hopped her way up the ranks to attain her position(s), I have to wonder if these rumors are more well-founded in fact than mere employee-grousing as she is totally ineffective "manager" to let such happenings to go on without bringing the hammer down on these idiot's involved, or she just let's it slip on by as to her "thinking" it's OK...till caught and come to light, then it can be dealt with by getting before camera, smile goofy and say even goofier stuff. Gee! What a set of idiots? What next is to come to light about these dregs of society????
12
Good job Matt and Sarah! It's all coming clear now...

The DDA did not want Reyna to testify at the Grand Jury proceedings because she may have been asked why she didn't call the SERT team. She would have probably also been asked if she had had any reason or 'experience' not to feel confident that they would have handled the situation with competency. She would have had to either talk about her complaint, which would have made it look like she willfully failed to bring in the most qualified individuals to handle the situation because of her personal vendetta. This would mean she has some personal responsibility in the death of Aaron Campbell. Or secondly, she would have to lie, and subsequently, the Mercury would have likely found her complaint against the SERT and exposed her dishonesty, and she would be in serious trouble for lying under oath.

Perhaps, did the District Attorneys Office not call Reyna because they believed the transcript might eventually be released to the public, as it was at their request...

So here's the million dollar questions:
Did DDA Don Rees know about Reyna's past problem with the SERT and not call her as a witness because he believed that she would likely be asked why she hadn't called for their assistance?

Did DDA Rees ask Reyna to lie under oath and not mention her problems with the SERT, and she refused, and subsequently was left off the witness list because of it?

If the answer is yes to either of these questions, the Grand Jury findings are tainted and should be ruled invalid.

People, this community needs a new Grand Jury to take a look at this case and determine if, any of these individuals involved, and the list is getting long, are culpable in the death of Aaron Campbell, or in attempting to cover up the investigation, including tampering with the Grand Jury process.
13
For about the 2nd time, I fully agree with Blabby. Hazing is one thing, but these reported events are just plain moronic.
14
The accusations by Reyna whether sufficient to support her claim or not, are alarming at least. The real problem here is that this crap makes the public (and your readers) think that the local police are just a bunch of imbecilic, juvenile, sexually obsessed, moronic, pea brained, F**K UPS! This behavior is the work of a small number of the privileged special police...and unfortunately condoned by the "leaders" that want to "work" their way to the top - and stay there!
The truth is that most officers (including those in PPB) do not put up or participate in the kind of crap Reyna describes. AND they pay for it by being left high and dry when they make a mistake due to lack of training, support, and leadership. Those on top will stay there and those on the bottom will be left to fend for themselves.
15
@ Whistle Blaster: You are spot on with your comments. The key is Reyna having to answer potentially troubling questions under oath. DDA Rees could have tried to steer the GJ's line of questioning away from damaging testimony had Reyna appeared (like he did with some other witnesses according to the transcripts) but to not have called Reyna to the GJ at all is a glaring omission that begs the question, "why?" And since the GJ already found a no true bill, there is no going back. That component of all this is over.

I think there are two processes left where Reyna would still have to testify under oath - a civil suit brought by Campbell's family or a federal civil rights case if the feds file one in District Court. I am not sure what an inquest might accomplish as the GJ has already spoken.

Another way to check out the possibility that Reyna did not call SERT in a timely manner in the Campbell case would be to research Reyna's past SERT call outs and look for timeliness in those cases, the circumstances involved, etc. If a pattern develops that would be cause for concern.
16
Let me get this straight, the question in this case wasn't, "did these [way below what even a fraternity would do] behaviors happen?" but "did those actions result in a hostile workplace?" Cause that is just messed up.

And good job Sarah&Matt, this stuff is very good.

@Ex-Human: The Grand Jury can look at the case again, there is no double jeopardy clause for Grand Juries. In practice it isn't done unless something substantial changes, (like this, for instance,) but there is no reason the DA couldn't bring a case again and again just because they felt like it. I doubt the DA would bring this one again, it would just make them look bad when it everyone knew that they'd been hiding something the first time around, but the DA can be replaced at the ballot box if people are pissed enough...
17
Second Grand Jury! This time with *all* the facts.

I'm going to make a quick call to the city tomorrow. If they can't get it together, I'd bet this issue has become big enough that the DA will be handed his walking papers in our next election.

p.s. I'm an Army Vet who served in the Infantry. Which means all men. And I *never* wore a g-string to sit on another dude's face while singing YMCA. What self-described hetero does that? (Oh....right. None.)
18
@Ex-Human: I agree with Matthew D., in that the community can demand a new GJ be convened. They do it to the organized crime bosses all the time.

Another idea is file a complaint with the BAR against Rees because of his failure to provide Reyna to the GJ as a witness under the theory that Rees had acted willfully and committed an ethics violation by not zealously representing the citizens of Portland. Surely, her testimony was germane to the entire chain of events and chain of command surrounding the death of an unarmed man. Perhaps public pressure and national attention would force the BAR to 'do the right thing', and sanction Rees.

Hence, in light of this, the cry for a 'new' GJ would be a reasonable request from the community. I'm sure the Justice Department would prefer that the State of Oregon resolve this matter internally.

And perhaps, a new Grand Jury would find that Reyna is truly the one responsible for the death of Aaron Campbell. the scene was chaotic, and it may have been due to a lack of respect Lewton and Frashour had toward Reyna that caused them to act as they did: 1. Ryan Lewton starts screaming commands at a emotionally-suffering, cooperating man who had walked out backwards and put his hands on his head; 2. Lewton shoots Campbell with beanbags; 3. Frashour has no ear phone to receive a command from the commanding officer, so he shoots too when Campbell moves-
19
Why would you ask for another grand jury from Schrunk's office? You're just giving him instructions on what he needs to pretend like he's investigating the next time around. How many times do you have to complain about the grand jury process to realize they've decided their job is Portland-style "process," not to get an indictment in these cases? What kind of "prosecution" invites defense expert witnesses during a grand jury, but not important real witnesses? You're never, never, never going to get a different result from him. Then, Westerman and his overtime-hogging goons can puff around about how the obviously conflicted, pre-determined "process" "cleared" them again.
20
@NoKnees: You're right...we need to abolish this corrupt, bias practice called the "Grand Jury system"-
21
The best way to avoid these kinds of workplace bullies is to see what their employees really think about them on sites like eBossWatch.com
22
Many of you trying to speculate that Reyna did not call SERT because she has a beef with them are wrong. It really disgust me that you are trying to pin this on Reyna. But alas, could it be (most certainly) that Reyna was no longer in charge of the incident. Don't you recall that another Sgt. and Captain were on scene. They men who did not trust the decision of a woman. This is what it's all about.

Stop this crap about trying to create a conspiracy about Reyna and her past with the SERT team. She made the call to walk away, remember. It was her male superiors that probably took over and created the chaos and mess for this unfortunate victim.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.