Comments

1
Wow, kids these days. I'm trying to decide if the anarchists were always in ineffectual, or if they're worse now.

#getoffmylawn
2
Effective use of the bold tag there! Just reading that brought back bad memories of wasted time in my past and made me want to claw my eyes out. I did laugh pretty hard at the Twitter comment since it echoes my earlier post about email-adverse anarchists in the 90's.

On the upside, "Propositions, Pontifications and Vague Strategizing" sounds like a good title for a compilation album of major label artists covering songs written by anarchist bands.
3
Eighty years ago, anarchists got things done. They were so effective that police had to resort to frame-ups and murder to neutralize them. Police used to infiltrate radical groups with agents provocateurs to gain positions of trust and influence and use that influence to steer groups into actions that would make them unpopular, and/or provide a plausible pretext to violently suppress them. Often such agents would just show up at rallies or demos and start sh*t there (still popular today, e.g. Quebec 2008).

Today, though, it seems police have changed tactics and now plant agents in would-be radical groups to act as idiots. The effect is the same as if such were indeed the case. Idiots in black make asses of themselves, and right-wing blowhards fill the comment pages with blanket denunciations of progressive values, based on the adolescent numbskullery of children in "radical anarchist" costumes/uniforms.

It's *good* that these kids want to make the police accountable to the public. It's *stupid* of them to give in to provocations shown in the above video. Every time things get rough at marches/rallies/demos, some twit has played right into the hands of a bully with a badge who kept needling him (and yes, it's usually "him") until he pushed back in some way. Then the "violent subversive" story gives the pigs all the cover they need to do whatever they want. And if they go "too far?" We already know what kind of consequences are in store for them.
4
You guys have been on other publications for not saying "police kill man," so I'll throw this out there:

Could "adds to the image of the man as someone grappling with mental health problems" be more accurately reflected as "adds to the image of the man as someone who was trying to commit suicide?"
5
spring break woo
6
Free bike!
7
I could write an equally condescending story about every single Citizens Review Committee meeting ever. At least it looks like the anarchists actually had a tangible impact on one abusive cop, which is more than the CRC can say. And what is Blogtown if not one hugely ineffective discussion circle?
8
Organized anarchy! It's like the new military intelligence.
9
The police building on 47th and Burnside is now headquarters to the Traffic Division (aka the cops on motorbikes).
10
Anarchists are lame.
11
Organized anarchy. It's what's for dinner.
12
Hey man, are you going to wear your black hoodie? yeah me too!
Oh, tomorrow night?-i can't go, i gotta go to my mom's in Beaverton. it's my grandma's birthday. yeah, I can't wait to tell her i'm a vegan now. she'll be like, "want some ice cream sweetie?" and i'll be all, "NO Nana, i'm a vegan you facist!"
13
"The way people are mobilizing right now is through this thing called Twitter which once you get all those phone numbers plugged into it will send a text message to everyone."

I didn't know my great Aunt Peg was an anarchist?
14
I can't wait for the actual anarchy revolution to go down. It will take three hours to decide what to have for breakfast.

Willamette Week guy got kicked out (of a public park) by this crowd. Hilarious.

I think miguelaron has been saying it best.
15
I hope someone stole his bike and he has to call the police to report it stolen.
16
@blabby: What? I didn't realize that the WWeek was so toothless. These fucking asshole are distracting from the legitimate issue of the public/mental health crisis that is systemic to America (and PDX).

Fucking white people making me be embarrased for my race. Stop acting like entitled honkies.
17
@Graham, white guilt is a powerful thing. As I just commented in the morning news, I think even if the cops had tazered this guy, these kids would be outraged that the "pigs" tazered a mentally ill guy. This is a lose-lose situation for the PPD.
18
DLS3.0 -

At least Jackie would still be alive if they had Tasered him.
19
Yeah, I noticed that the "black bloc" doesn't seem to include any actual "black people".

I'm not sure why Willamette Week left when asked. Maybe they were menaced or something. He says they identified him as "corporate media." Willamette Week. Hilarious.

"The Revolution Will NOT Be Twittered."
20
@Jackattak, true. But with how broken our system is, he wouldn't get the treatment he needs/needed and would be back on the street... It would be a matter of time before another call about him came in. I think the problem is how many mentally ill folks are left out on the streets with no hope for treatment.
21
Nana and Aunt Peg ftw.
22
"Collins also had lung disease, says the examiner. Definitely signs of a hard life."

Could've been suicide by cop, it's super hot with soldiers who don't want to go back to Iraq... Sad, but true.
23
@martin, who would've thought... When I talked to Aunt Peg the other night she was shocked to find out you can email photos. She doesn't even have a computer or a cell phone, I wonder how she found out about Twitter?
24
Anyone else notice that before he throws the bike the cop intentionally runs him over with the motorcycle. I'm not saying this is self defense but that cop sure wasn't trying to defuse the situation.
25
@econoline: I'm sure no one else noticed that. Neither did they notice where it was referenced in the article itself. Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
26
That's funny Graham. Because from the almost entirely pro-police comments on this blog and the general tone of the article you'd think that no one noticed that the police provoked the situation by menacing and attacking the protesters with their 1/4 ton plus motorcycles. Which, to me, is quite an affirmation of everything the people of Portland are angry at the police for.
27
If there is anything the nonconformist hates worse than a conformist, it's another nonconformist who doesn't conform to the prevailing standard of nonconformity.
28
@TruePatriot: What exactly are "people of Portland" angry at the police for?
29
i wonder if there's any drama in the "spring breaaak anarchy woo" community when there are multiple people wearing the same style of black hooded sweatshirt.

moreso, how are the anarchists going to raise awareness of their campaign when they politely asked all the press to leave?
30
@glass houses, I think that only brought a smile to his face, nothing more. That cop was obviously provoking the protesters, that guy should have taken the higher ground and not given him the ending he wanted.
31
@miquelaraon: Traditionally speaking, the Black Bloc intentionally all wore identical (or at least very similar) clothing. This was done to attempt to thwart identification of participants and aid in de-arressting people. This group of protesters shows a definite lack of dedication and gumption.

SPRING BREAK!!! WHOO!!
32
Now, far be it from me to pass up a chance to make fun of anarchists BUUUT… Lets consider the supposed adults in the room. You cannot tell me that wasn’t a video of a cop intentionally running a motorcycle into some peacefully walking kid’s bike. You might not like the kid. He might smell bad and make terrible dinner conversation, etc. But is this how we do crowd control in Portland? (And by, “we”, I mean “the City”, not anonymous sadists that troll messageboards.) That cop was intentionally making other cops’ job more difficult in the moment and in the future. Or he’s the world’s worst driver. Either way, he is not helpin my city and should, um, get the fuck out.
33
RE: Kicking the "corporate" press out of a public park.

So these progressive kids are against public lands and a free press? Sounds more like fascism to me.
34
No one here knows what happened with the "kicking out the press." It almost certainly wasn't a top-down decision coordinated by everyone at the meeting in the park. We DO know they allowed Sarah to stay there and be oh so bored, and more importantly: we have video of cops menacing and attacking the protesters with deadly force: 1/4 ton motorcycles.
35
Aren't you supposed to get out of the way of the police when they have their lights and sirens on?
36
@graham so, what you are saying is that s.b.a.w.=dress the same day?

failure to yield to an emergency vehicle
37
Keep parroting "spring break woo." It's very, very convincing.

Yeah, these kids are obviously just bored and out for a good time, as evidenced by the meeting that was so slow and democratic that Sarah, someone who routinely covers several hours long political snoozefests left before anything even happened.

Sounds like my idea of a great time. Totally Spring Break.
38
@miguelaron --and I'm sure the cops will make the same argument. But he wasn't on his way to an emergency. He was supposedly providing crowd control and decided to cause an escalation.
39
What do all you stalwart defenders of Private Property have to say about the protester's bicycle being crushed in the video? Or the other reported damaged by the same overt police bullying?

Does that draw your ire? Or are you only incensed when corporate property is damaged? "Oh, won't someone think of Starbucks' bottom line!?"
40
ok, so s.b.w + col summers/4loko involvement = this.

Where is the enthusiastic/charismatic leader who will assist in translating public unrest/dissatisfaction to the heads of our democratic leaders? i can truly see how MLK Jr./H.Milk/etc etc had problems keeping their protests/marches peaceful.
41
@night moves, lights and siren were on though, plausible deniability.
42
@miquelaron: I do not know what "s.b.w." or "s.b.a.w." are.

@TruePatriot: Did you watch the same video I did? Because no bike was "crushed" in the video I watched. You seem to be confusing criticizing the protesters with defending the police. It is possible to not agree with both parties in a conflict. The officer on the motorcycle shouldn't have nudged the guy with the bike. The guy with the bike shouldn't have thrown it at the cop. Both are assholes. Ta-Da!
43
"spring break woo"
"spring break anarchy woo"
44
Oh how nice and simple. A neat little equivalency.

Person A: a cop, a representative of state power, sworn to serve and protect the citizenry, attacks one of those very citizens with a deadly weapon, damaging their property and endangering their life after nipping at their heels for who-knows how long hasn't provoked enough of a reaction

Person B: retaliates in a relatively benign manner, causing zero damage. they are subsequently arrested and charged with multiple crimes. obviously the intent of the provoking officers in the first place.

If you need me to explain further why, in addition to the cop clearly being the provoker and the egregious differences in the use of force, these two individuals should be held to entirely different standards in the first place, let me know.
45
There were several provocations leading up to that moment. Police bumping into people & plowing through the crowd with their cars for no reason. Running up with weapons. Fake out after fake out with intimidation & threats. Several people had their bikes &/or bodies run over by motorcycle cops. Everyone stayed really calm most of the night. If only one person took the bait, that's pretty good. Would any of you hipsters behave so well under similar conditions?

The 2 people detained were a media videographer (grabbed by the throat just to be ticketed for J walking) & a bicyclist that refused to ride on the crowded sidewalk. One person allegedly throws a bike & the whole protest is painted with a broad brush. This is why the corporate media is not welcome. Oh & the communique was released by a single affinity group that doesn't speak for the whole spokes-council. Granted, they probably should've been clear about what time they wanted press there & in what capacity.

Impromptu spokes-councils are not fun. But what decision making process is? Have you ever watched C-span? I prefer one where what I say actually makes a difference. Unlike representative democracy where some people get to vote for some rich asshole who speaks for everybody. It's certainly not easy when you have disruptors interrupting with random statements or rhetoric. But those 3 people, annoying as they were, do not broadly represent the overall mood of the discussion.

Most anarchists are quite tech savvy. Indymedia, which predates blogs & social networks by a few years, was written by anarchists. There was nothing like it before. You wouldn't have code for your little blog here if it was not for anarchists. Twitter too. International Anarchist media/tech activists have changed how the world gets its news/information & you, in your ignorance, point at some random hippy or aging punk that showed up to an open meeting as the representative of anarchism. Then you wonder, for real, why corporate media doesn't get to hang. Wonder why you're the trite Lawrence Welk of journalism...
46
@austin - You are probably right, he was provoking the guy and was most likely happy it worked.

New topic - am I the only one who is tired of Mirk including the fact that she rode her bike in every story? Yeah we fucking get it, you rode your fucking bike, why not just add it to your byline. "Posted by SARAH MIRK, I RODE MY BIKE THERE"
47
@glass houses: I fail to see where smirk mentioned her own bicycle. I think you're projecting a little bit.
48
Sarah Mirk, if I went to your Mercury writers meeting, would I find it thrilling, or would I find it boring and wanky? We didn't put on a show to impress you personally, we had a meeting to decide what we wanted to do and you invited yourself. In meetings, people ramble on, people exaggerate, people self-aggrandize. The job is to minimize it but it happens. If you're looking for a show, try the opera.
49
Graham, this time she 'rolled in to' the park, I guess she could have been rollin' on twenties but from previous 'news items' I know better.

I just wish the original post had been less biased against a group of people who are actually trying to do something. I don't care if she was put off by the tone of the event and decided to go eat dinner instead, I don't care if she was put off by the tone of the event at all. Tell us what happened and let the reader decide, we are smart enough to figure out if they are flakes for ourselves. Not every item has to be an editorial.
50
PROTIP: IF YOU DO NOT WANT THE PRESS AT YOUR EVENT/MEETING DO NOT SEND OUT PRESS RELEASES OR PUBLICIZE THE EVENT TO THE PUBLIC.
51
Every resistance movement begins with a small revolt. Average people can recognize that the same corporations who cut benefits and cut workers are rapidly depleting and degrading the land-base then the movement grows from revolt to revolution. The system is functional for the profit of a few at the expense of the majority.

The claim of ownership over the land and resources is against the principles of equality and commonality. For instance, we all depend on clean air and water for life, yet that is being compromised by those interested in profit at any cost.

Some anarchists in the street means that some of us refuse to capitulate to authority. Some of us won't follow on the concrete walkways built to disconnect us from the dirty ground, instead we walk in ancient footsteps with deep roots in the soil.

Destruction of the police state is the aim of the resistance, and we want all who see a better possible world to act with solidarity because our privilege to get in the street would mean being murdered outright in many places. We have an obligation to end the destruction of the eARTh because we are it, and it is all we are.
52
my grandson went and told me that when the kid threw the bike at the CycleCop and over he went, that as he got up, it was obvious the seat of his pants was puffing out, and soon a tea-like liquid was falling off the cuff of his leather trousers. To make matters worst, his colleagues assisting him were all dancing around struggling to stay downwind of him, so it was obvious the dude crapped his pants and pissed 'em as well. In my book, that's an automatic WIN for the protesters. Anytime you make a cops shit his pants or piss 'em, then it's a "game over" and the protesters can throw up their hands in victory salute to each other. Way to go kids! Do it again...make 'em all shit their pants, or at least, piss 'em! We're counting on ya!!!!
53
If I, a white anarchist in my twenties, cannot even relate to what the fuck these kids are talking about, how the hell are they going to BUILD A MOVEMENT that includes anyone? Call me a great big liberal sell out, but I think that in order for political organizing to work, it has to be, well, somewhat organized. That means having a media plan, an outreach strategy, and yes, publicizing the goddamned endpoint of your fucking march, so that if people want to join it, they can, and so that the media can tell people what the fuck you are doing, so that people can help your cause by getting involved. I'm just as supportive of direct action as anyone around, but the point is to be strategic.
A word to the wise, self-righteous vegan crust punk kids. If you are alienating your own base by treating experienced radical organizers like we're way too dumb, or old, or level-headed enough to possibly understand your politics, if you don't think it's a valuable use of your time to use the media as a tool, or follow up with people who want to build coalition with you, then your work will never be relatable and your "small revolt" will never turn into a "resistance movement."
Also, seriously, if you are 70 anarchist kids marching masked up through Southeast Portland, do you really think that not divulging the end point of your march is going to keep the cops from fucking with you? The cops have eyes in their heads. Your security culture is not a cloak of invisibility. The only people you are preventing from knowing what you are up to are potential allies and sympathetic reporters.
54
Not to beat this to death (err, bad figure of speech, sorry), but Graham is absolutely right that the kid & cop ARE both assholes. But (and this a very big ‘But’), we have a system in place for meting out consequences to teenage assholes. The cop, in contrast, is getting a nice salary, via our taxes, to be a Consequence-Free Asshole.
55
Please correct "It turns out the protester who threw his bike at the officer was arrested." to read "Joel David Dow was arrested for the incident" as it cannot be discerned from the video who threw the bicycle, and it is my understanding that Joel David Dow intends to enter not guilty pleas to all counts he was arrested on.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.