Why is it problematic? I don't care if 99% of the houses out there are larger than mine as long as mine is sufficient for my needs. I don't care if 99% of the people out there can buy more food than me, if I'm never hungry.

It's an effective slogan -- I'll grant you -- but it's also a prejudiced, divisive, superficial, and lame slogan. If the question is whether everyone has sufficient means or opportunity to live a healthy and productive life, then I agree it's a question that should be discussed and a problem that needs to be addressed. But if it's just a matter of class envy and hatred? Then it's just the same sort of unproductive demagoguery too often a part of politics as usual between the Republicans and Democrats.

Doesn't it seem hypocritical, anyway, for an Adbusters started protest to be using a McSlogan?