And of course, you can use the Bible to defend just about any fucked up thing you come up with. It's even kind of into the idea that strangers and the people just down the road are evil, and you should kill them too.

The editor of the paper should have at least gone through and omitted some of the just dirt-dumb things, like "our government is based in religion" and "Jesus spoke against homosexuality". Even more so, when you're inciting violence -specifically and directly- you don't get free-speech protections.

The real counterpoint to the kid's point is really, "Should religious hatemongers be put to death?" Because he spends very little time even talking about adoption, which is what he ostensibly is discussing.