http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS…

Nice guy, but his arguments are rather flawed. It's not so obvious if you just watch the video. It's clearer if you read though his transcript and read the Bible passages yourself, or of course if you know the Bible well. EG in his opening theological argument, he claims that Matthew chapter 7 has a passage about determining whether a teaching is valid or not based on its "fruit". But if you read Matthew 7, you find that it's actually referring to testing whether a prophet is valid - quite different. More details here: http://stasisonline.wordpress.com/2012/04/…