Comments

1
Something, something stoners put down the pipe long enough something something.
2
Oh, those hapless potheads. Can't fill out a form correctly or remember if they're eligible voters. We love ya, potheads!
3
My most recent encounter with one of those signature collectors:

I'm alone at a MAX station waiting for a train on my lunch break. I notice a young man on the other platform with his back to me, staring off into the sky for several minutes. Finally I see the train approaching a couple blocks away. At that time, I see movement out of the corner of my eye, turn, and it's the signature collector waving his arms at me like a stranded castaway to a passing cruise ship.

"Sign the petition to legalize marijuana?"
"I already signed it."
"Oh, this is a different one." How do you know which one I signed?
"Well, I need to catch this train so I don't have time."
"It's ok," and with that he jumps off the platform onto the tracks, crosses the cable barricade, and gets onto my platform. The train is now a block away.
"I really don't have time." He's not interested in my protests. Fine, I'll sign the damn thing.

He hands it to me and there are about four signatures on it. Really doing a bang-up job there.

I write my name down and sign it as the train pulls into the stop. Before I can write my address, the doors open. I walk onto the train. He stands in the doors as they try to close on him and open back up.

"I need your address," he says.
"I don't have time. Either get on this train with me or leave." He does neither. The doors close on him again.
"Just tell me your address."
"I'm not going to tell you my address. I need to go."
"Just tell it to me." The doors close on him a third time.
"I don't have time!"

Finally he accepts his fate and walks away.


Moral: A higher rate of invalid signatures can only be due to discriminatory practices by the Secretary of State, and couldn't have anything to do with the typical nature of the people gathering signatures and those providing them.
4
Honestly, who cares? The Oregon Cannabis Tax Act (Initiative 9) is the one that really counts and it's destined for the ballot this November. Plus we got Willie Nelson on board! ;-D
5
I second that, who cares about this so-called measure 24? Who is this Robert Wolfe guy anyway? His website doesn't have one picture of Oregon or a pot leaf, I think he was just trying to dilute the signature gathering effort by OCTA (Oregon Cannabis Tax Act). Bob Wolfe's initiative would have made it illegal to grow your own pot at home without a license and effectively makes the state your dealer. I asked one of the signature gatherers for measure 24 what the difference was between measure 24 and OCTA and he replied that OCTA would put an unfair tax on Marijuana implying that measure 24 did not, but measure 24 would have taxed all sales on marijuana as well as home cultivation. You don't have to buy a permit to make beer at home or grow tobacco in your backyard, why then would you need one for marijuana? Now this Wolfe (in sheep/stoner clothing) guy is trying to create bad press for the marijuana legalization movement by exposing just how asinine and corrupt his own sham signature gathering effort was and then try to associate his actions with all legalization efforts in the mind of the public.

WHO CARES?!! OCTA PASSED AND YOU MR. WOLFE HAVE FAILED HAHAHA!! NOW GO BACK TO BEING POINTLESS.
6
I-24 would have repealed Prohibition. Period. You are spreading inaccurate information.
Marijuana will be the hottest political news all summer long, and candidate after candidate - including Kate Brown - will find that taking the drug warrior platform is a ticket to loserville, just like Dwight Holton discovered.
7
Did you even read measure 24? Measure 24 (not Initiative 24, it is not an initiative and never will be), had it not violated Oregon law, would have made it illegal to grow hemp without a license issued by the government, which is already the case in Oregon, but permits must be issued by the DEA which is why there are currently no hemp farms in Oregon. The first legislature regarding marijuana, The Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, did not itself criminalize the possession or usage of hemp, marijuana, or cannabis, but it included penalty and enforcement provisions to which marijuana, cannabis, or hemp handlers were subject. Violation of these procedures could result in a fine of up to $2000 and up to five years' imprisonment. Similarly, measure 24 would have required the state to investigate all violations and pay to prosecute all offenders which would include anyone growing marijuana in there home for personal use without a license issued by the state.

I-9 or the Oregon Cannabis Tax Act does not require hemp to be grown with a license and would allow a free industry of hemp in Oregon creating thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in revenue which would dwarf any and all recreational cannabis sales made by state authorized dealers.

How is adding a comment about a defunct measure spreading inaccurate information? Also prohibition refers to all drugs and not just marijuana so who is spreading inaccurate information now?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.