Comments

1
DIDN'T THEY NAME A SW PORTLAND RESTAURANT AFTER YOU?
2
YAY MORE PARKING ARGUMENTS

Also, yay for this development.
3
Damnit! You know who I blame for this...Randy Leonard. No, uh, wait...Earl Blumenauer. No, maybe it's all Neil Goldschmidt's fault. No, it's all the creative class hipsters fault.


Ah hell... This is such a one-note act. It's just hard to keep this shit going sometimes...
4
This is an affront to our way of life and this aggression will not stand!
5
Drunk n' Write: Cara Amico has a great little bar inside, which I bet you already know.
6
Didn't Conway want the streetcar to be extended to the new Conwayopolis?
7
I like how the last paragraph of the article is the most consequential one.

NEVERMIND THAT SHIT! NEW DEVELOPEMENT FUCKYEAH PORTLAND!!@!! GREEN
8
@fidelity right?
9
If only we could add jobs like we add housing there might be a reason for 1,200 more people to move here.

We somehow have ended up to celebrating development for its own sake. Greenie planning establishment and our "alternative" news weekly have somehow ended up being the best friends a rapacious real estate developer could have. Strange state of affairs.
10
Con-Way owns the property fair and square. For better or worse they can undertake a brave new monstrosity such as this if they so choose.
That said, my own fondness of the NW Industrial Area died not long after Drugstore Cowboy anyway. I really ain't gonna lose any sleep over it.
11
Hey, those blocks have been empty for a long time - I'd love to see them turned into a neighborhood. And Portland's supposed to have the lowest vacancy rate in the nation, so I think there's definitely demand for more close-in apartments.

I have some rental apartments in SE...I wonder if this development would lower my rents? That's a lot of new spaces. Good for the city, bad for me?
12
Maybe we should just not have any public squares or parks. Not only would it take care of the homeless "residents" problem being attracted to them, but it would take care of the "Occupy" problem, too.
13
" and through it all, I did it ConWay........"
14
@Turdwell, "Con-Way owns the property fair and square."

And by "owns" you mean that they will still have to get public approval from the City leaders and PDC. Hence, this preparatory news article is like a thumb of lube before the real tussling begins.

I will begin the public debate thusly: OMFG WHERE IS THE LIGHT RAIL?! TRAITORS!

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.