Here's why Paul Constant has nothing to do with quality: http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Ar…

Hi. I just read an interview of an anonymous Academy Awards voter. Just one. Approximately 6,000 other people also cast votes. "I'm willing to bet the majority of them think just like [him/her]."

Speaking of unassailable logic, I also urge you to "remember that Oscar winners are rarely the best movies." We know this because there is always a clear-cut definition of what exactly "the best" means.

Using the quote "I wouldn't have voted for him because I didn't like the movie" as a basis for a post titled "here's why the Oscars have nothing to do with quality" doesn't quite work the way you think it does.