Covering your faces with bandana's for protests has to be utmost of pussying out.
If you believe in your cause, whatever it may be, you make it personal. You show your face and charachter.
It helps to persuade people. (notice how the writer said people crossed the street to avoid you)
That said, your cause is bullshit.
So, keep up with the faceless protests and keep on scaring people away.
Effective.

I just googled AXA group and as far as i can tell, they're some global insurance group based out of France. Sooo, what does this have to do with animal testing???

My general sense is that animal rights protests are more about shock (look, we're naked for...something!) and little shitwads trying to hook up with girls that must be easy because they'll get naked for a PETA protest.

I have not, in my ongoing decade-plus of vegetarianism, seen anything to make me doubt this understanding.

While I'm 100% against animal testing, and eating animals, etc.. I can find little common ground with these wantonly obnoxious and methodically misguided fashion "protesters".

Is there any point to covering their faces at all? I don't think the local or federal government could give a shit about this nobody group. It's more likely they are self-sabotaging...