Comments

1
I felt like I was watching a re-enactment of a 1980s San Francisco art "happening." The performers seemed to be having a really nice time.
2
I am of people who really liked this show. And for all intents and purposes, following my own standards, I should have disliked it. I usually hate unscripted theatre, I am not a very big fan of dance that lacks choreography, and I usually loathe audience participation. But for whatever reason, I found this loosely structured, chaotic mess of a piece to be compelling.
Why though? I can't say for certain (yes you can call BS). I am still making up my mind about it and why I'm continuing to think about this piece and what exactly made the impact but...
I think I liked it because it wasn't afraid to be hated.
I think I liked it because it didn't feel like a performance but a school yard game.
I think I liked it because it was messy.
I think I liked it because it wasn't trying to teach me anything or change my mind about something.
I think I liked it because it was some hippy shit, it was some 1980s San Francisco shit, and it was also its own shit.
I think I liked how genuine Hennessy was. And how that translated into the room.

I realize that what I saw and what I think I liked I will probably not see or like again as the nature of the show is to change. But I think I like that too. And I would even go on to guess that that is one of the main ideas behind the piece.

K, there's the counterpoint you asked for. Don't know if that helps...
3
I really don't get how such an airy, meandering, and poorly thought through piece of work can be taken seriously. And I'm not talking about the dance. I mean...this review...it's just like...it's nothing. You accuse the piece of being self-indulgent. But the only indulgence I see is the half thoughts on this page that you have deemed worthy of publication. Seriously...whither your critical eye? Your deep and substantive investigation of the issues in this work? Or perhaps your willful failure to write something that would be legible as a review, and your preference for loose, atmospheric quotation, is related to Hennessy's refusal to make an easily readable dance piece and his own preference for all-over improvisation. In whatever case, an understanding of failure is obviously crucial to understanding this piece as well as your review. The difference is that your failure seems born of idleness and lazy thinking, whereas there is nothing idle about the bodies on that stage.
4
Jenna- go see the Faustin Linyekula piece. I think you'll like it....
http://tba.portlandmercury.com/TBA/archive…

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.