Dear Portland Mercury (and Ms. Romano):

Ms. Romano's backtracking from her Oct 6th commentary, in this edition [Oct 13th], was not in the least bit insightful. First, did Sam Adams fail to give someone at the Mercury a "day after" call? In my years of reading the Mercury, this publication has done nothing but criticize this guy yet he's been, so far, more responsive to a massive movement against corporate greed than most political leaders. Soooo, what's the deal? All of those "Hall Monitor" articles ring awful hollow as you criticize a long overdue movement from the comfortable space behind a computer. I'm not suggesting the movement does not deserve scrutiny; however, the Mercury, including Ms. Ramano, have held an attitude towards all things reminiscent of South Park's "Stan" when he realizes everything 'sucks.' But he's supposed to be a child and your publication is supposed to represent an adult perspective. So do your best to critique the world less like an angry adolescent and provide some useful commentary. Portland has been a vanguard in movements for the poor and disenfranchised. While not perfect, our leadership is above the fray and perhaps that is why those who put their safety and lives on the line are willing to give law enforcement credit. Though, it may be difficult to make that assessment when you refuse to get involved. Just saying.

Regarding the "Occupation": I'm so relieved to learn that mine is not the only voice of dissent regarding this occupation business. I'm really sick of the whole "if you're not with us you're against us" and "they're wrong so we're right" attitude that this alledged movement cultivates. I hope eventually that either this thing finally grows a head or that it inspires people who can actually affect change to do just that. In the meantime, these people should really review their notes from Government and Critical Thinking since they don't appear to be very clear on how the Government works at any level nor how to form a coherent argument (or how to counter one). Also on that point, since most of them don't appear to have actually received an education (receiving a Liberal Arts BA is not the same thing as getting an education) perhaps they shouldn't be expected to repay their student loans (a large percentage of the loans probably squandered on a lifestyle rather than a life). And may I request of the spokesmodels of the occupation that they please, please, please not presume to represent anyone but themselves and their like-minded buddies. They sure as fuck don't speak for me. Thank you.