Savage Love Oct 25, 2012 at 4:00 am

Porn Warn

Comments

1
Ah, infidelities where sexual partners can spread diseases are AOK with Savage. As long as it's a one time thing. Gotchya. Sounds like a Free pass for all people in Savage's mind.
2
Better advice: How would you like to be treated? Would you want your boyfriend to not tell you about cheating on you with someone he will be seeing often because "whoops it was the druggzz!"?
3
Sounds like the christian purists are crawling out of the floorboards for this one, huh.

But yeah thing is... STRAIGHT people don't just get high or/and drunk and just decide to have GAY sex. This does NOT happen. So "Not a Lesbian I Think" was clearly LYING when she claimed that she's straight. I'll totally accept that both she and her finger-banging buddy are both Bi. Or Bi-ish. Because that makes sense, given the non-situation here.

Not everything can simply be blamed on the drugs.
4
"Ah, infidelities where sexual partners can spread diseases are AOK with Savage. As long as it's a one time thing. Gotchya. Sounds like a Free pass for all people in Savage's mind."


Well, that's actually Not what it sounds like at all. A very vanilla-type encounter happened, Dan Savage okayed not telling the long-distance boyfriend about it as long is it was indeed harmless and one-time, and this foolish conservative troll calls it a "free pass for all people" because he apparently reads Dan Savage's mind.


Conservatives are evil people who hate America.

Conservative dude, you are an enemy of our nation.
5
Gratis, so a secret "vanilla-type encounter" is okay because only that nasty kinky sex carries a disease risk? (ropes and paddles are crawling with syphilis) Or you wanna rephrase that? I suggest "low risk."

FYI if you hadn't noticed, Savage endorses lying fairly frequently. He likes to blur the line on poly (and monogamy) and make it some kind of "spectrum" right up to including premeditated dishonesty in long term non-abusive relationships. Not only conservatives think that's shitty.
6
p.s. will somebody fix the fucking italics tag?
7
Sounds like some christian douchebag really has it in for Dan, doesn't he?

And why don't you ask jesus to fix the "fucking italics tag"?
8
italics fixed? testing
9
Did you read the advice? He said, "if you didn't contract anything." So he is not condoning infidelities that spread diseases. That being said, I don't agree with the lying part. If you have sex with someone (even if it's not something you'd normally do, but happened because of drug-induced lowered inhibitions and horniness) that you see frequently, or LIVE with, chances are you'll be tempted to do it again, even if it means recreating the circumstances with tequila and E. I know this from experience. As for judging this person's sexual orientation, well, half the men I've slept with (myself being a man) are heterosexually identified, and it only amounted to a one-or-three-times thing. Straight people are allowed to have gay experiences/experiments as much as gay people are allowed to have straight experiences/experiments. It can be argued that we're all bisexual to some degree, no matter how we primarily identify ourselves. Read about the Kinsey Scale.
10
Let's make this SIMPLE, shall we?

If you are STRAIGHT - that means you sleep with the OPPOSITE sex.
If you are GAY, that means you sleep with the SAME sex.
If you are BI, that means you sleep with BOTH sexes.

Are we clear?
11
Damosa, you are such an idiot.

Here is a fact. Some straight people DO engage in sex with members of their own sex.
Those people, who do identify as straight, are still straight. Even if they go out and have sex with members of their own sex.

Look into it little man....
12
Samuel (clearly not real name), YOU are the idiot here. I proposed basic scientific FACTS. That you chose to dispute said FACTS places you in direct company of a Birther. Therefore, your opinion is here forth null and void!

If you have sex with someone of the SAME sex yet still identify as "straight", there's a term for that too. It's called "CLOSET FAG".

Disliking your post.
13
Not only are you wrong.

But YOU are a HOMOPHOBE!
14
Oh, pulling the "homophobe" card aren't we? Sounds to me like someone's gotta gas and can't admit when he's lost the argument.
15
you use the word fag. you are a total homophobe.
16
@samuel

Are you retarded?
17
Get over yourself, dude. 'Fag' is no-longer exclusively synonymous with being Gay. Didn't your dumbass get the memo?
18
Oh I see. You authorize who gets called what as far as sexual identities go AND you dictate what is or is not viewed as an offensive word......

You are a very fucking stupid person. Later dude.
19
Bye then!

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.