I was hung up on the judges as well. Damn!! I'd vote for whatever judge they endorsed- especially if they gave a reason why they were chosen. In my notes I'm in agreement with just about all their endorsements- except for the gill netting measure. I wish I knew how they came to endorse a "no" vote. I'm tentatively voting yes- but my ears are still open if anyone wants to talk!
Vote yes on the school bond if you want to see your property values take another 5% haircut. Check out Parkrose if you want to see what blocks of tax sales looks like. People will sell short and move, it's not just huffing and puffing.
Lentsparker, I felt the same way at first about the gill netting measure. This might help: http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-29130-t…
(sorry to link to your competitors, Merc)
You're missing the Democrat, Carl Hosticka, in House District 37 who is challenging Julie Parish in a closely contested race. Learn more: http://carlhosticka.com/ He is a stand up guy with the endorsement of the Democratic and Independent parties of Oregon.
The school bond measure is bullshit and totally out of line with Portland's shrinking school-aged population.
The arts should be supported by patrons of the arts not taxpayers.
Stop advocating for tax measures that dump all the cost on homeowners who are already buckling under seemingly mandatory yearly tax increases despite sagging property values and meager job market.
My property taxes increased by $2,000 this year despite my property value dropping by $30,000.
Researched it with friends, we found it basically shifts the proportions of fish caught to allow more sports fishing (some of the measure's biggest funders being sporting goods companies) instead of commercial fishers, and that the same amount of fish would be harvested. It's not the most humane method, but that's hardly what this is really about.
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission says NO, so does a few of the original supporters of the Measure. And Governor Kitzhaber is already working on some middle ground.
Why yes on the arts tax? I hope you idiots at the mercury know that the money wouldn't just be going to schools; it would be going to arts institutions that already receive thousands upon (perhaps millions) of dollars in yearly donations already. But of course you guys knew that already; the proponents of this measure paid you airheads off to endorse it. Nice one; sellouts. *cringe*
http://www.ucrcc.org/2012/05/07/judges-on-…
(sorry to link to your competitors, Merc)
To offset those suggestions, here is a Cheat Sheet from Oregon League of Conservation Voters: http://www.olcv.org/2012endorsements
And another from TheBallot.org:
http://www.theballot.org/
http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-1973…
http://www.osbar.org/judicial/JudicialVotingGuide1209.html
The arts should be supported by patrons of the arts not taxpayers.
Stop advocating for tax measures that dump all the cost on homeowners who are already buckling under seemingly mandatory yearly tax increases despite sagging property values and meager job market.
My property taxes increased by $2,000 this year despite my property value dropping by $30,000.
Researched it with friends, we found it basically shifts the proportions of fish caught to allow more sports fishing (some of the measure's biggest funders being sporting goods companies) instead of commercial fishers, and that the same amount of fish would be harvested. It's not the most humane method, but that's hardly what this is really about.
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission says NO, so does a few of the original supporters of the Measure. And Governor Kitzhaber is already working on some middle ground.
http://earthfix.opb.org/flora-and-fauna/article/some-backers-of-anti-gillnet-measure-change-course/
http://earthfix.opb.org/communities/article/tribes-oppose-oregon-measure-to-ban-gillnetting/