Soccer Town 

Lents Gnaws on Beavers Stadium Idea

RESIDENTS OF the Southeast Portland Lents neighborhood are cautiously optimistic about a sports deal that could build an 8,000-seat stadium for the Beavers minor-league baseball team in their beloved neighborhood park. The debate among the community is primarily about parking—but at its core, it's also a discussion about what kind of neighborhood Lents wants to be.

The possible Beavers stadium move actually hinges on deals within a different sport: Merritt Paulson, the owner of the Portland Beavers and Timbers, is looking to acquire a Major League Soccer (MLS) team for the city. If Portland wins the soccer contract, PGE Park—the current home to both teams—would need to be brought up to MLS standards. That would mean shelling out public funding for an estimated $35 million renovation of PGE Park and booting the Beavers elsewhere.

Consultants hired by Paulson think the best place for a new baseball-only stadium is where the 1,000-seat Charles Walker Stadium currently sits, on the edge of the grassy 38-acre Lents Park at SE 92nd and Holgate, close to a planned MAX line. The site is also in the middle of the Lents Town Center Urban Renewal Area, which has neighbors fantasizing about the new restaurants and retail spaces that could spring up to serve the game-goers.

Beavers games at PGE Park have brought in an average 5,408 fans per game this season. With 72 home games a year, that could mean big money for the struggling neighborhood. At a meeting last month, neighbors say Beavers consultants told them each game could bring $250,000 into the neighborhood.

"Not all the people in the neighborhood really believe that it could bring in that much," says Jeffrey Rose, a member of the Lents Neighborhood Association (LNA) who is more excited about the new social dynamics a stadium could create than the economic benefits. "You'd see more Lents folks going to the game, and it'd be something positive where we could see our neighbors," Rose says.

The sticking point for many neighbors is that the 5,000 people potentially pouring into Lents for a game would need places to park. Paving over a major part of the park—the neighborhood's precious open space—is not a popular idea.

"It's a very, very important park to the neighborhood," says LNA Crime Prevention Coordinator Clint Lenard. "We have music in the park, we have movies in the park. I'm in favor of having AAA baseball here, but I'm not in favor of donating half of Lents Park to make it happen."

The Lents neighborhood email list has been lighting up with ideas since a stadium work-group meeting last week. Some suggested locating parking at the nearby Eastport Plaza, or maybe constructing an underground parking garage. But the email discussion also contained reflections on how the stadium could change Lents' character.

"I hope we also can visualize this community for the next generation, and consider what we are passing along for them to build their memories of," wrote LNA Chair Dewey Akers in a sincere, seven-paragraph-long email to his neighbors.

But Lents may be getting ahead of itself: The nitty-gritty planning details are still for a highly hypothetical parking lot, with the whole deal hinging on whether Portland will win the MLS contract.

"It's a competition, and one of the factors will be the community support for the stadium," says Beavers consultant Dan Lavey, referring to both the enthusiasm about the stadium and the willingness to pony up public money for the renovations.

Comments (11) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 11

Add a comment | All comments »

There is not a single professional soccer team in the USA that is turning a profit without subsidies being paid to the teams by local communities in the form of tax breaks and other incentives, and the amount of new employment that these teams bring to town is minimal. The city needs to stop footing the bill for sport's franchises that come to town, charge them property and other taxes, and let them compete on an even / level playing field with other businesses in the city.

Posted by charlespaugh on August 21, 2008 at 4:26 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Because other businesses in the city do not receive tax breaks and other incentives.

And whether or not the team itself turns a profit ultimately has anything to do with benefit to the community.

As usual, Charles shows off his staggering amount of ignorance.

Posted by Daaaaave on August 21, 2008 at 7:30 AM | Report this comment

Charlespaugh has no idea what he's talking about. Apparently he's never heard of the corporate minimum tax or the city giving tax breaks to businesses to lure them here. Also, the Timbers are turning a profit. Shows you how much chuck up there knows.

This is a flat out great idea that should be supported by the city and the Lents neighborhood. Everybody wins!

Posted by BlackedOut on August 21, 2008 at 11:04 AM | Report this comment

Bringing MLS to town stands to have a $1.1 Billion net positive impact on the Portland economy over 9 years through tax revenues, job growth and infusions for ad spends - according to the third-party economic assessment. This is not something we as a city should turn our back on just because some old dude is afraid of traffic near his house on a few days a month in the summer.

Posted by Akers on August 21, 2008 at 11:58 AM | Report this comment

Pro sports stadiums don't bolster local economies, scholars say
http://www.news.uiuc.edu/news/04/1117stadiums.html

Experts "haven’t uncovered a single instance in which the presence of a professional sports team has been linked to a boost in the local economy."

Also, eight weeks ago, NPR did an expose supporting these same numbers that professional sports teams do NOT boost local economies. It is a fallacy.


"Sports economists agree that cities--and taxpayers--get close to nothing from spending public money on sports teams. What they haven't figured out is why we're still doing it."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/03/19/ballpark_figures/

These are some resources for you to turn to. Sports teams do NOT assist local economies but rather in the long run hurt them. Thirty years of numbers don't lie. Akers, there is no supporting evidence to your $1.1B claim whatsoever.

Posted by charlespaugh on August 27, 2008 at 10:06 AM | Report this comment

Add a comment

From the Archives

Author Archives

Most Commented On

Top Viewed Stories

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use