eric cantona 
Member since Apr 20, 2009

click to enlarge cantona7mc1_788896_jpg-magnum.jpg

Manifesto/Bio

old. fat. slow.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Collections

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Currently

irony-ing.

Updated on April 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Recent Comments

Re: “Gloaters Gonna Gloat

people on both sides of this issue need to get a fucking grip.

17 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 05/22/2013 at 1:24 PM

Re: “Today in Chumming the Anti-Fluoridated Waters...

fuuuuuuuuck.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by eric cantona on 05/06/2013 at 3:59 PM

Re: “Project Runway Wrap Up!

dispatch a car to Beaverton to see if Andy's head exploded.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 04/26/2013 at 11:53 AM

Re: “Neighborhood Group that Fought Division Street Development Asking for Help with Legal Bills

Blabby - yes. still a significant number of units. question: have you ever worked to get a project developed with Portland's zoning code? plenty of rules there, bub. personally haven't heard of any "progressives" pining for their removal.

sgp - maybe. but isn't there two sides to every story? I know it's "just" a blog, but can we at least pretend to provide something approaching balanced?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 04/08/2013 at 9:14 PM

Re: “Neighborhood Group that Fought Division Street Development Asking for Help with Legal Bills

25% is probably a little high. even 20% represents a significant cross-section of the housing market, though. and it will grow as the close-in parts of Portland continue to get denser.

5 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 04/08/2013 at 4:42 PM

Re: “Neighborhood Group that Fought Division Street Development Asking for Help with Legal Bills

could you be any more one-sided and myopic in your reporting on this issue? it's like you're Portland's version of Paul Constant, with a local flair.

I honestly think that some form of parking minimums MAY be the way to go on this issue, but the City will get their asses handed to them by the courts if they try to change the rules after they've granted a developer the go-ahead to start construction. Hale's lost a ton of credibility on this by getting all knee-jerky.

one other thought - if you are carless do you want to pay for some other asshole to have unfettered access to a parking spot? adding parking minimums to the code make it so everyone is subsidizing the parking at every development they live in. Blabby will say that they drive anyway, but he's wrong. there are lots of people in Portland that don't have cars but end up paying for automobile storage anyway. is that fair?

11 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 04/08/2013 at 3:33 PM

Re: “Miserable Bartender

RickStevens = StJohnsRules???

could it be?

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by eric cantona on 03/25/2013 at 4:33 PM

All Comments »

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy