OregonizedCrime 
Member since Jan 8, 2010


Manifesto/Bio

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Links to Me

  • Nobody links to me!

Collections

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Recent Comments

Re: “To (Not) Tell the Truth

..and there are deputy da's who have violated privacy policies for their own personal interests. Yet another conundrum.

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 02/15/2013 at 5:34 PM

Re: “To (Not) Tell the Truth

...and the MCDA's office has personally kept deputies they supervised who lied...without even putting a write-up in their employee file.

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 02/15/2013 at 5:33 PM

Re: “To (Not) Tell the Truth

Buuuuuuuuuuuuuut there is evidence floating around that exposes the MCDA's office has lied. What a conundrum.

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 02/15/2013 at 5:27 PM

Re: “Rogue Cops in the Dock

Matt,

Could you try to do a follow-up story on Angela DeCourt? That story was really troubling and is the only one I've ever seen that actually exposed how things are done behind the thick veiled curtain of secrecy known as Multnomah County's local "justice system". IMO, it's a racket.

The MCDA stepping-up at trial with a drafted agreement offering to drop all (the obviously trumped-up) charges against the young local mother who alleged police degradation, retaliation and abuse in front of her 9 year old daughter, that came as a result of Angela simply asking officers about an incident she and her daughter were witnessing involving another citizen that concerned both the mother and the child.

The MCDA stepping-in and dropping everything: Theft of Public Service, Resisting Arrest, and Interfering with a Peace Officer, in exchange for Angela's agreement not to pursue legal action against: the County, and the officers. Quite frankly, I have a very hard time understanding how that particular activity is not considered corrupt. And what that local government office did, in order to keep things on the down-low was very telling. I mean what else have they participated in that our citizens are not aware of?

Who else have they made false allegations against?
Who have they manufactured reasons for prosecuting?
Who have they used government resources to retaliate against, at taxpayer expense, because he/she blew a whistle on some pretty incredible misconduct this city at times goes ahead and rewards, because of it's incestuous relationships with unions.

Consider that someone defending Dauchy's and Humphries acts against Yeager's expert testimony, that the violence that occurred was triggered by Dauchy's acts said: "Obviously an expert whose paid $200-$500 per hour is going to blame the officers."

Sure, the poster was correct only in that the defense found an expert who did not agree with the officers course of action. But the reverse side of that same coin is also critical for the public to be aware of:

The prosecutor presenting cases for prosecution and the Judges delivering rulings on alleged police misconduct in Multnomah County coincidentally all get their paychecks from the same place, and obviously fall under the same umbrella of employment. How's that for a big fat freaking conflict of interest?

Hence my continued interest in where Decourte is at, whether she is pursuing action for what occurred to her AND HER 9 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER, and whether or not anyone has been able to get the names of all of the officers on the scene the night the incident occurred on Max last August. Do we know if Dauchy or Humphries was present at the scene that night? Somewhere I read that there were 5 officers total from the PPB and the Multnomah County Sheriff's office present at the scene.

It would certainly be interesting to know.
Thanks!

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 03/06/2010 at 1:22 PM

Re: “Rogue Cops in the Dock

Yes, this exactly what our world has come to, in Multnomah County and the Portland metro area.

Yes, the prosecution may have gotten a Multnomah County Judge to rule that the officers assault of a 12 year old girl was within the law, and to sacrifice the 12 year old's rights unconsciously/consciously for "the good of the cause", with everyone involved convincing themselves that probation would be a good lesson for her, because of her REPORTED past behavior, but the decision to charge the girl for assaulting a police officer in this situation was an injustice.

Deciding whose expendable, and whose not, regardless of whether rights were involved and wrongs occurred, IMHO in order to keep the status quo and to maintain Humphries appearance as being lawful, obviously critical to the City's pending litigation and unfortunately because government employed union represented misconduct is excused IF the unions want our local officials to excuse it. That IS the reality of it. I personally know how "the system" works.

Throwing a minor in front of a very well organized "legal bus", the same minor many who are outraged believe was blatantly and UNNECESSARILY assaulted by two grown men, to know the Judge obviously viewed all the evidence, listened to the expert testimony, knows all the backgrounds, and for her? to arrive at the decision she did, was incredibly disturbing. And I believe it will have broad-reaching ramifications.

IMO, the totality of the decision from the justice system, demonstrated publicly to this little girl, who clearly does not feel of any value, confirmation of that from "The Law of the Land"; that SHE does not matter, that HER RIGHTS to equal protection under the law DO NOT APPLY, and it confirmed things I am sure she has heard or read about offending officers not being held accountable for excessive force and/or even killing citizens unnecessarily.

But for this court to add insult to injury, by making that same 12 year old girl accept charges for the unnecessary assault the two police officers committed against her, IMO was reprehensible and that it sent a clear message to this 12 year old girl with obviously no effective support system; that grown men degrading and disrespecting her, a child, violating her rights and unnecessarily viciously assaulting her was okay, AND THAT SHE DESERVES THAT KIND OF TREATMENT FROM GROWN MEN, and the police, and that the local justice system approves of assaults on her, because the justice system doesn't believe she is worth protecting.

The officers acted appropriately in removing the girl from Max, and charging her with interfering with transit, but EVERYTHING beyond that, that went beyond an appropriate use of force; degrading the 12 year old girl and pulling her violently around the platform by her hair (had she pulled the officer's hair it certainly would have been deemed assault), and in response to her protecting herself from that officer's acts, to have allowed these two police officers to proceed to unleash the physical blows that they did against her without consequence, is beyond reason.

But the ending of this story was predictable, the rampant disregard for citizens rights by the local justice system, when incidents involve government employed union represented dysfunctionals has become incredibly obvious.

What was actually surprising, is the continued unadulterated arrogance of the officials involved, and our local justice system, when so much outrageous human capital is on the table (and has been repeatedly in the past) due to poor choices made by union represented deputized officers, tolerated by the local government, while under intense public scrutiny right now. And that in addition to one of these officer's receiving zero consequences for his participation in the death of an innocent mentally ill citizen, officers admitted presented no threat, our citizens now see the age of this same officer's victims of violence, dropping to as low as 12 years of age. That's pretty incredible isn't it?

Historically in the city of Portland I have got to ask, how many other girls 12 years or under, are on record as having been assaulted by two police officers, in the fashion that this one was?

My hope is that the latest, and littlest victim of our "local justice system", does not cast her pearls before swine, individuals who clearly should be in no position to pass judgment on her OR ANYONE ELSE, or allow them to define who she is, and who she has the opportunity of becoming.

She CAN change her stars.

It's quite obvious in this little girl's short life, that has never had an inpenetratable support system. I hope someone with discernment is able to step-in, intervene on her behalf, and assist her in developing one that will not betray her, and/or abandon her as she's evolving, and will commit to constantly reinforcing her value, until she actually begins to believe it herself and that they work with her to understand the importance of constantly working towards:

1) Learning to love herself and others, because she deserves the peace of mind and security it will offer her,
2) Developing an unshakable faith in herself,
3) Using every lesson she learns, so she can identify future Red Flags, in order to avoid harm,
4) Understanding that life will not be not fair to her at times, and that, aside from the outcome of this incredibly unfair incident, going forward if she stays on the right path, she should not consider that unfairness as being exclusive to her, and for her to understand everyone in some fashion, at one point or another encounter some form of unfairness in
their life. Some unfortunately, over and over again.
5) Surrounding herself with positive people. There's an old saying; "Show me your friends and I will tell you who you are."
7) Finding a mentor she aspires to be like, and working tirelessly from that point on, towards achieving her goals.
8) Living Winston Churchill's quote: "The pessimist sees the problems in every opportunity. Whereas the optimist sees the opportunity in every problem" "Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense."
9) Knowing that men (and women) assaulting children, women and other men, unnecessarily IS NOT OKAY. And that although she made a poor decision to disregard the exclusion from Max that night, she did not deserve those two police officers assault on her.

And regardless of what she may have heard or read about the incident, there were an incredible number of citizens who were distressed she was harmed, who were hoping for a justice result for her, and continue to hope for one.

Thanks Matt! Great article.

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 03/06/2010 at 12:47 PM

Re: “DA to Defendant: Don’t Sue Cops, We Won’t Prosecute

It's clear to me, based on other things like this that I've seen personally, Angela was coerced into signing the agreement. I think after hearing the story and others like it, any reasonable juror would look at officials involved in this mess and wonder why they would make such an offer if they knew Angela was guilty and officers hadn't harmed her in front of her young child. Obviously that was not the case, was it? They would also wonder why this man chose not to fully investigate Angela's claims...does not look good, does it?

And in my opinion, this is exactly where the problem lays. If deputized officers and stewards of the court were prosecuted when it's found they've violated another's rights, and/or used their power of office to make a union dysfuntionals problems go away, and suppressed evidence and or failed to fully investigate complaints at the expense of violating a citizen's rights, we wouldn't even be having these discussions.

They themselves speak about the need for stiff sentences to deter crime, but when it comes to punishing one of their own for similar crimes, and/or it's a deputized union dysfunctional that's tuccus is on the burner, the law doesn't apply.

If it makes Angela feel any better, there's been other serious retaliation, and harassment of families associated with government employee whistle blowers of deputy misconduct, including anonymous systematic harassment and threats sent to whistle-blower's wife at their home, in addition to threats/harassment from someone who claimed they rape little girls...of which the whistle blower and his wife have! You think this isn't happening? I've got physical proof. Funny thing, when it was reported to Ret. Officer Schmit and the cybercats at the PPB on at least two occasions, with the IP Addresses and the ISP's acknowledging it was an offense, the PPB stated that it's not against the law to send those kind of harassing threats anonymously to women and children. Buck Wild ring a bell? No wonder that officer felt comfortable calling local women and claiming to be hiding in their basements while threatening to rape them and their children. Based on what Officer Wild's employer told this woman in September of 07' and her husband in August of 08', the PPB didn't seem to think there is anything wrong with making anonymous threats of sexual assault against local women and children. Consider that because of police stonewalling, that woman still does not know if there is a credible threat against her and her children. Her life is not the same.

I hope Angela DeCorte is able to find competent counsel who subpoenas all past complaints made to officials against deputized union dysfunctionals who have; stalked, harassed and terrorized others...you will be surprised at all the things they've been hiding from the public and chose not even to investigate, because of their relationship with the unions, and make them tell how what ALL they have done to whistle-blowers of misconduct by deputized union dysfunctionals, and the whistle-blowers families.

And if they don't give Angela's counsel all the "stuff" they subpoena, evidencing a pattern of conduct certainly pertinent to Angela's case, "stuff" that includes suppression and coercion by a local public servant and steward of the court, one just might face the same repercussions Mike Nifong did.

Multnomah County needs to come clean, REAL CLEAN!

Posted by OregonizedCrime on 01/08/2010 at 6:03 PM

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy