I guess it's just me and my friends whose opposition to the bill rests almost entirely in the fact that our city leaders want to loot $5M from the citizens to give to some construction firm to build the fluoridation plant, at a time when the city is facing a $21M budget shortfall and laying off employees?
I mean, science-schmience, if we're going to raise a multi-million dollar bond for public health, why can't we just give the money directly to poor people, instead of contractors and a handful of temporary construction workers?
@Rusty: why do you assume it was just one phone call? Amy Ruiz and Mayor Adams have said there have been continuing conference calls between city mayors.
I'd love to hear a recording or read a transcript of this "therapy session" of our elected officials! Anyone else?
One of the options: repeal or change the law that singles out the USPS and forces it to fund its pension plan to a ridiculous degree. There's something like $75 billion in the pension fund, which is covering the retirement of postal workers who have not been born yet. I don't want to deny retirement benefits to any of my union brothers and sisters but letting USPS tap into some of that money will more than cover the $5.5 billion shortfall.
And fuck the whole "government waste" angle. Corporations waste money, too. That is not the problem with the postal service.
PRIMARIES ARE WHERE THE MOST DEMOCRACY HAPPENS
Rule Zero: NO BOOZE
(Sorry, Sarah)
A generally happy person, lately. Generally.