<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>







































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Short Circuited
    
      by Denis C. Theriault</title>
      <link>http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Rss.xml?id=comments&amp;oid=6195913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Short Circuited
    
      by Denis C. Theriault</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Portland Mercury. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Portland Mercury readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Portland Mercury.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@portlandmercury.com (Portland Mercury Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:15:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Short Circuited]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6232630]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6232630]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[DamosA]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Ok, so the Mer. as a whole is an out-right "anti-police" paper... yeah like i said - only a COP-LOVER would think and see that!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Profile?oid=916506">DamosA</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:56:59 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.portlandmercury.com">Portland Mercury</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Short Circuited]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6230819]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6230819]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[bullnose]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[the repetition of these articles makes it loud and clear, the Mercury is pro-smear campaign against the law enforcement. i'm all for accountability but the merc makes this its primary subject material each and every issue. makes you wonder who is behind all of this. you feed off the police brutality bandwagon bullshit and turn a blind eye towards the thousands of positives things they do. did you not read my entire comment? take some anger management classes before your panties get in a bunch. you're nothing but a sheep in wolf clothing
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          bullnose]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:22:16 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.portlandmercury.com">Portland Mercury</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Short Circuited]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6230336]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6230336]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[DamosA]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Ok, so clearly you're a cop-loving fuckwit who confuses articles legitimately criticizing how law enforcement conducts itself, with being "anti-cop".  <br>
<br>
So i guess according to YOU, copper, police accountability = anti-cop, right?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Profile?oid=916506">DamosA</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:57:42 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.portlandmercury.com">Portland Mercury</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Short Circuited]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6229469]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/short-circuited/Content?oid=6195913&show=comments#6229469]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[bullnose]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[is this like the 10th anti-cop article in this issue? not saying it's a legit argument but a definite pattern has evolved over the course of the last few years. like sensationalizing these cases is its primary agenda, and done in a very narrow minded perspective. i don't think the public is anywhere near capable of policing itself. LE is a tough job, dealing with heartless criminals, deranged lunatics, and every once in a while corralling a loose python. so until science builds us the perfect robotic cop guess we'll just have to live with imperfect human cops.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          bullnose]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:40:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.portlandmercury.com">Portland Mercury</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



