Don't Be So Dense 

Northeast Neighborhood Discusses Smart Density

news3_maggy.jpg

"DON'T EVER let someone call you a 'Not in My Backyarder' [NIMBY]. If you don't care about your backyard, no one else is going to," said City Commissioner Amanda Fritz to a crowd of 40 neighbors who woke up early on the morning of Saturday, April 18, to discuss density in the Irvington neighborhood.

Apartment and condo projects planned for the historic neighborhood are good for transit and bad for sprawl—but are there ways to build density that don't upset the neighbors?

A planned 71-foot-tall condo project called Irvington Squire ["Raise the Roofline," News, July 10, 2008] tested the waters last summer for high-density development in the tree-lined neighborhood of historic homes. The response from neighbors was sour: The bed and breakfast across the street from the development draped its deck with a banner reading: "Shrink the Condos!"

At Saturday's density workshop, a new infill development was on residents' minds: a plan to split up a historic estate on NE 28th and develop it into three new houses.

"We don't want to change the face of our neighborhood without considering architectural integrity," said resident Kimberley Schafbuch. "It's scary."

"When you come in and do something like this, it can change the whole feel of the street," agreed neighbor Cindy Bilotti.

Metro Council President David Bragdon was on hand to point out that Portland is actually less dense today than it was 50 years ago. Portland's growth since then has been "built on 30 years of cheap land and cheap fuel," said Bragdon. "We're going to have to figure out a way to bloom in a truly urban way."

Filling inner Portland neighborhoods with denser housing is one of Mayor Sam Adams' top priorities because it means less need to sprawl outward as Portland gains population. Last week Adams stumped in East Portland for Senate Bill 907, which will allow Portland to combat ugly infill with a more extensive design review for dense development in transit corridors and town centers.

Fritz supports the bill but thinks Portland can't leave out infrastructure as it plans for denser housing. With the budget crunch, the city is slashing funding to all departments, including long-term planning projects and the Office of Neighborhood Involvement.

Developers and the city will run into problems "if you cram too much density, too much height in neighborhoods where it doesn't belong," said Fritz. "If we design it right, the neighbors will love it."

Comments (3) RSS

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Its scary? People need to stop using that phrase in association with clearly non scary stuff. I thought Portland was all about progressive urban planning, density, mass transit. I thought the reason you live close in on the East side is because it is close in, dense, thriving. If you want CC&Rs, if you want restritions on the free expression of style, if you want to hamstring dense development ... move to the burbs. Scary. LMFAO.

Posted by Demondog on April 23, 2009 at 9:06 AM | Report this comment

I bought a house in inner se Portland w/ a large lot cause I wanted a garden and space and I wanted to be close in.... that was possible 12 years ago....not so much now.....now greedy developers are swooping in on houses like that, destroying them, destroying gardens, mature trees, neighborhood open spaces, and building light blocking monstrosities....chipping away at my quality of life.
Happily some of these developers and speculators are losing their shirts and are being forced to find real jobs. Hopefully, we can use this downturn as a time out on shitty infill that degrades livability.
Now if these developers and speculators want to build big monuments to their egos...go ahead...go build them in degraded environments of the urban core (redeveloping parking lots, strip malls, brown fields, etc...). Not in anyone's backyard.

Posted by jkpete on April 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM | Report this comment

Demondog, do you own or rent?

the problem with our local planning is that we're supposed to increase density in some places, and "protect existing neighborhoods" elsewhere. It's that second part that seems to fall by the wayside. My neighborhood of old single-family homes is zoned so that someone can come in and build a triplex on a standard 5,000 sf lot. How is that protecting the neighborhood?

Posted by Blabby on April 27, 2009 at 12:14 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

From the Archives

Author Archives

Most Commented On

Top Viewed Stories

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use