ELECTION FOR SALE
After June's primary elections saw an across-the-board failure for local non-incumbent and non-mainstream candidates, many critics blamed the discrepancies on campaign spending. The common argument says that the more money paid out for advertising strategies, the better the chances for victory. Critics say it is a system based less on merits and more on money.
In an effort to level the playing field in local elections, commissioner Erik Sten (himself a well funded incumbent in June) has somewhat ironically begun early work on a public campaign finance program.
"Right now, we're working on parameters--what is legally possible," says Marshall Runkel, one of Sten's staff members.
"The ten-thousand-dollar question is, if we do have a public [campaign] finance mechanism, how will we fund it?" adds Runkel, acknowledging that this is closer to the "million-dollar question."
Runkel says they are looking closely at the current program in place in New York City, which provides public matching funds to candidates who agree to meet contribution and spending limits, and to fully disclose the sources and uses of these funds. In spite of the program in NYC, Michael Bloomberg won their mayoral election by spending 50-plus million of his own money. ANNA BOND