Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
More In News
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
PO Box 86208, Portland, OR 97286
PO Box 86208, Portland, OR 97286
...add to that factor studded tires. I'm not paying for a bunch of road damage just because some people can't drive in their weather. Those should have been taxed ages ago.
In the meantime they should put some Tibetian prayer wheels so bikers / walkers can be comforted as they transverse.
And is it a bridge fee if I drive over it, but a bridge tax if I don't?
Cut out of what? The bridge? That doesn't make any sense.
It's stupid how bridge improvements are such a hard sell. You may not contribute as much to the wear and tear in a car, but having a bridge collapse is going to ruin your day all the same if you happen to be on it.
The land up the hill from the bridge moved 3 feet, pushing the bridge 3 feet, so they cut out the three feet that had moved, and propped it back up as if nothing had ever happened.
Trucks over that weight is state law, Paul. I guess they're trying to protect "interstate commerce."
Considering the landslide, I can see that argument. It doesn't help, however, that the road has been ground down to the rebar in places. That will also have an effect on the structure in the form of torques making the rebar pop chunks of concrete from under the walkway. This was noticeable the last time I biked across that bridge, which was ten years ago.
2) Why not just toll it?
3) Since the point is to raise $$$ rather than curb behavior, bikers AND pedestrians should have to pay, regardless of whether or not they already own cars. And I agree that overweight trucks should have to pay more.
4) If you're living in the metro area and you have studded tires, you're a fucking loser.
In the early 1960's, the hillside on the west end of the Sellwood Bridge slid several feet toward the river, pushing the bridge structure and damaging the bridge. The county removed several feet from the bridge deck and jacked the support piers back into place to account for the hill movement. The bridge is still damaged from this landslide.
Tolling has been studied as a way to fund a new Sellwood Bridge. Experts predict tolling only the Sellwood Bridge would not work. The majority of traffic would detour to nearby bridges without tolls (Ross Island, Hawthorne, etc.), which would force the county to increase the toll on the Sellwood Bridge, which would cause more traffic to avoid the Sellwood. Tolling the Sellwood only simply would not generate enough revenue to sell bonds to build a new bridge.