Comments

1
Nice quote from Saltzman at the end! And it does seem to be a real "eff you" to Saltzman that Adams is going to use contract savings from BES—Saltzman's own bureau—to fund the "kickstart" fund, after Saltzman almost took credit for a nice little surprise idea last week. Very weird political maneuvering going on, there. Almost...circus-like.
2
Sam is a cycling sham. Saltzman deserves a lot of credit. Without him Sam wouldn't have provided any money. The fact that he's taking money that should be used to protect rovers and trying to fool cyclists into thinking he's doing them a favor is downright delusional. Saltzman offered real, ongoing money. Because Sam's pride was at stake he's willing to try to scam us. Bull. As for Nick and Randy...shame on you both. At best you put sucking up to Sam ahead of a real and substantive proposal. We'll remember.
3
they got just one tiny detail wrong: curb extensions are hazards for cyclists, not enhancements...

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.