Comments

1
Wait, I thought the alleged urination was because he had a stain on his pants, which would imply that his urination wasn't exposing his genitalia in the first place.
2
@Matthew D: The training division report does, in fact, say that Humphreys "noticed a fresh wet outline on the rear and mid to upper thigh of Mr. Chasse's pants which led him to believe that Mr. Chasse had urinated on himself." As far as I know, the officers said nothing about Chasse exposing himself. Nonetheless, the commander says that indecent exposure was a valid reason for a pretext stop.
3
I suppose when I run into the man who is going to kill me, I may also have "a look of sheer terror" on my face.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.