But I don't understand why 'cis' is a bad word? I mean, in a world where trans people are starting to really come out, doesn't there need to be a word for... 'not' transgendered? I mean, sorry, but it's kinda bullshit of you would say you'd prefer we call cis people 'normal'. But if you tell me what you'd prefer instead of 'cis' that's fine with me. I just consider 'cis' to be like the 'straight' of gender, and I do think the word 'straight' is necessary.
The problem with "cis" is that by using it, you are endorsing the idea of a societally-defined "right" gender. Much like straight vs. gay, it reduces people to labels and actions. The alternative in all cases is not the creation of new categories (two-spirits, anyone?) but a willingness to get to know individuals and to love all people. That's much harder than a prefix!
Meanwhile BruceWang, using "normal" to describe 80+% of a population is not bullshit. Our culture's forced conformity and fear of difference is bullshit, as are our rigid, anachronistic, and oppressive gender roles. You must first create a non-oppressive world within your mind before you can understand why cis is bullshit.
WOKKA WOKKA WOKKA
Meanwhile BruceWang, using "normal" to describe 80+% of a population is not bullshit. Our culture's forced conformity and fear of difference is bullshit, as are our rigid, anachronistic, and oppressive gender roles. You must first create a non-oppressive world within your mind before you can understand why cis is bullshit.