Comments

1
Just no Daleks please. For at least another decade.
2
On the plus side, maybe we can see Amy Pond's legs in 3-D.
3
Let's see, what do I think about this? I think that someone needs to GO BACK IN TIME AND KILL THOMAS EDISON. And the Méliès brothers for good measure.
4
I think they should get Arthur Dent/Watson/Bilbo Baggins to play the Doctor. That'd be just another feather in that guys hat.
5
THERE ALREADY IS ONE DOCTOR WHO MOVIE. NO ONE NEEDS ANOTHER. THE DALEKS LOOK BEST IN TECHNICOLOR.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/142471/dr-who-an…
6
@MARQ: EAT A BAG OF DICKS.
7
The HP image is the greatest in the world. I find it hard not to laugh looking at it.
8
I REALL HOPE THEY CAST VIN DIESEL AS OPTIMUS PRIME IN THE MOVIE!!!
9
Why is this necessary when the show is still on and is still good? I do not want.
10
@Joneser, I can see a movie having value if it came at the end of, and in addition to, a regular series. Somewhat like what the X-Files did with their movie: the season and movie complimented each other. It would be a great way to cap off (literally) the reign of the 11th Doctor.

And just to be clear: NOT like the horrible second X-Files movie, which completely ignored the events of the last few (HORRIBLE) seasons of the X-Files.
11
@Fruit Cup: I agree that an in-continuity movie would be pretty groovy, but that sounds like the opposite of what this is. On the other hand, they do say that this is "a few years away" so who knows?
12
Yeah, ditto tk.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.