Didn't vote for her the first go-around, and still disagree on a couple issues, but I think she has earned my vote this time.
Of course, haven't really heard from Nolan either yet.
@1: why would you say she's anti-bike? Haven't seen it. In fact, seen just the opposite. If you are referring to her stance on the bike-share program that was in debate not long ago, she was more in favor of using the allotted funds for infrastructure and safety improvement on SW Barbur. That section certainly needs it as it can be damned terrifying.
Anti-bike? Not seeing it. Concern for the safety and well-being of citizens as vulnerable road users? Sure.
Amanda is not anti bike she is anti waste. The bike share program is both waste and anti bike business. There were 6 existing businesses renting bikes downtown.
I am voting for Amanda because I don't want the 1% super friends (David Gold and Merritt Paulson) to get my tax dollars. I am tired of subsidizing those super friends with my $360 per year urban renewal property tax.
Of course, haven't really heard from Nolan either yet.
Anti-bike? Not seeing it. Concern for the safety and well-being of citizens as vulnerable road users? Sure.
I am voting for Amanda because I don't want the 1% super friends (David Gold and Merritt Paulson) to get my tax dollars. I am tired of subsidizing those super friends with my $360 per year urban renewal property tax.