Paul does an excellent job of bringing undue attention to things that no one gave two shits about in the first place.

"The New York Times does an excellent job of bringing undue attention to things that no one gave two shits about in the first place." FIFY Chuck.

"Mitt Romney's New Ad Quotes Obama Saying Something He Didn't Actually Say"
This headline is as stupid as Charles Barkley saying he misquoted himself in his autobiography.

Don't remember the NYT rushing to Newt's defense when he was taken out of context saying he wanted Medicare will wither on a vine.

Don't trust your memory, Andy. http://nyti.ms/vJ0yTC

Carl, I didn't deny that they didn't report it. The NYT threw stories like you linked to in the back pages, long after the front page out of context story and the repeated out of context video on the broadcast news did its damage.

The key word I used was "rushing", not hidden later in the back pages below the fold.

Careful with the triple negatives, there. I think I know what you mean to say, though.

So do you think that, as Chuck says, nobody gives two shits about this type of news? ...or that it IS important (SO important that you're still pissed about a 15 year-old failure to thoroughly report a misquote)?

I would not deny negating that it's untrue that Andy from Beaverton's posts are not unlike an unproductive use of our time. Quite the contrary.

Well Mitt's a lying mormon (e.i. christian) piece-of-shit anyways. So who cares what he has to say?

e.i., e.i. Oh?