It also says: The Chief Constable gets one whole pig every month, and 3 comely lasses of virtue true.
Before it's too late I'm going to support, restrain, punish, and employ a pauper. Not necessarily in that order.
"Portland's charter currently charges the council with clamping down on vagrants and paupers?"

I'm giving them an F on that one.
I thought the whole point of the charter review commission was that they didn't need council approval to refer things to the ballot?

Also, I'll point out that they were supposed to have wrapped up months ago and these housekeeping issues were supposed to be on November's ballot. But wait, Fritz is all about responsible use of public money...
What does this mean for your staff?
Given that the state has no actual obscenity code, that 2-105(a)(51) seems a good section to remove.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.

Add a comment

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.