News Feb 5, 2012 at 11:03 am

Comments

1
God that guy is fuckin scary. And I thought Obama was creepy.
2
"As things heat up in Egypt, Europe's cold snap has now claimed the lives of 200 people."
Thank God for global warming! Could you imagine how many people would have died without it?
3
(I don't think Andy knows how climate change works. But hey! Keep spreading that ignorance.)

I also thought this was funny: remember this Blogtown post last week, about Trimet finally getting tough on fare-dodgers, and issuing thousands of citations this year to help close their budget gap?
http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/Blogto…

Whoopsie! There's a new State law that says they're not allowed to keep any of that money. It was signed three weeks BEFORE Trimet announced they were going to spend almost $600,000 a year on hiring new fare inspectors.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/commuting/2012/…
4
"(I don't think Andy knows how climate change works. But hey! Keep spreading that ignorance.)"
Bring it on Reymont! Any day, any time. Put some money on it. I can prove that either NOAA or James Hansen's climate modeling program at Columbia has altered historical data. If I prove that data files differ between the two entities that contain historical weather data, you pay. BRING IT ON!
5
@Andy - Wow, you're so excited! I'm not sure why you think "altered historical data" would justify your ignorant assertion that climate change is synonymous with "there will never be a cold snap again." Seems like the chip on your shoulder just got a little heavier, there?

I'm also pleased as punch that to hear that your amateur Googling qualifies you to overturn the findings of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, the Independent Climate Change Review, the International Science Assessment Panel, both of the Pennsylvania State University panels, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the US Department of Commerce AND the National Science Foundation. I guess those guys all have egg on their faces, huh? You showed them! With your sleuthing!

The US Office of Inspector General stated that "...the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities."

But I guess he just didn't have your scientifical acumen. He should have asked you first, before speaking the above sentence under oath before Congress!

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/61233/…
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/…
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/…
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/…
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex…
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/20…
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-22/c…

And for the record....I don't want your fuckin' beer. Go crawl back into your cave.
6
Don't be such a coward Reymont. All predictions are based upon previous results, statistics 101. The data being used in James Hansen's climate modeling software at Columbia has a small percentage of data files that differs with the creators data files at NASA. This is research I found on my own, with code that I wrote to compare data files that should be exactly the same. But they aren't and they should be. You can't manipulate the data to get the results you want.
If you think I'm some hayseed idiot, put some serious money down and I'll match it.
Compare the data for yourself:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_…
http://edgcm.columbia.edu/~mankoff/Station…

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.