Comments

1
Just wondering: Has there been any reduction in crime, and if so, does anyone think the reduction is related to stopping and searching people?
2
There is a real and important difference between finding more crime and preventing crime. Hotspot policing is better at the former than the latter.

That said, the admission by the PPD that racism, institutional and otherwise, may be contributing to disparities in who is stopped is meaningful.


3
Yes, I think it's safe to say that racism is part of it. But as a poor white person, I ask why nobody has yet (as far as I am aware) suggested that classism might also be a component?

It's often really hard to discern the color of a driver at night, especially from a distance and without a direct view, but it's considerably easier to estimate the driver's class position from simple observation of the car. For example, perhaps those who drive clunkers are both disproportionately likely to both be of color and to be stopped.

Driving While Black exists, why not consider and address Driving While Poor? Because it's harder to quantify, or because there is no Poor constituency of consequence?

Terry Pratt, North Portland
4
Terry has an interesting point...I have seen numerous traffic violations near a police officer that did not result in being stopped. The vehicles:upper end or luxury. The drivers:White or Asian....coincidence? The economic factor seems to be a component however
5
Chundy: "Hotspot policing is better at the former than the latter." Oh, I thought I read a while ago that it was the other way around.. but maybe I'm not remembering correctly (I'm not being sarcastic).

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.