Cooper's point is alright, but is the current license to discriminate an argument against the bill really? Why not account for large swaths of the population that could be excluded for "religious" reasons?

I think if people want to wrap themselves in the Bible as a reason to discriminate, then they need to discriminate against people that commit EVERY sin mentioned in their holy book.

Why stop with the gays?

Then why can't airport bar muslims from travel which would have prevented the 911 attack.
If the feds don't have laws against it. Muslim religion extremists allow forgoing yourself to allah.