Thanks for the Mercury for covering, more and more detail please!
The 30% low income set aside from improvement districts is admirable. Putting those people in the actual benefitting districts has been opposed by developers. Put them elsewhere is proposed - send them to starved low income underfunded agencies . So play poor versus poor.
In South Waterfront are we creating another Yards at Union Station for new arriver PSU student subsidy?
In creating subsidized housing are we benefiting large low paying and low benefit businesses?
What low income as a per square foot rental rate? Depends on family size. After how many years those rentals become upper income rates is a discussion.
The 30% low income set aside from improvement districts is admirable. Putting those people in the actual benefitting districts has been opposed by developers. Put them elsewhere is proposed - send them to starved low income underfunded agencies . So play poor versus poor.
In South Waterfront are we creating another Yards at Union Station for new arriver PSU student subsidy?
In creating subsidized housing are we benefiting large low paying and low benefit businesses?
What low income as a per square foot rental rate? Depends on family size. After how many years those rentals become upper income rates is a discussion.
Just saying, keep on this!