I promise, I will NEVER compliment anyone's tattoo -- clothed or naked. Of the tens of thousands of tattoos I've seen, I can't think of one deserving of a compliment.
Most people commenting are missing the point. It's not that she doesn't want people looking at her tattoos, she's just asking them to have the decency to wait until she is clothed before engaging in conversation.
This is just basic locker room etiquette and had it been presented that way, without mention of the tattoos, I doubt anyone would have a problem with it.
Except you can get rid of a mullet by cutting or growing out your hair. The ink's mostly permanent no matter how stupid it looks. bummer. When this lady's nipple is brushing her navel the tats may not get the desired attention.
Oh my god. I really love that tat of my little pony on your meat curtains. Do you mind if I look closer? Closer? CLOSER! Oh. Not that great. My bad. Looks more like the Black Beauty. With emphysema.
Hello, tcraighenry. I only know 2 people in Portland, and I highly doubt this is one of them.
What I posted was basic common sense and nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to think that I'm friends with the author, you go right ahead and keep believing that.
Paul has a good point. It is a matter of etiquette. I personally do not comment on women's tattoo's when they are unclothed unless we know each other well,lol. Todd, I agree. I have no tattoo's but do have some scars and have had people in ask questions.......I may not per se want to be with someone who thinks facial scars are a turn on. Women that think that way (in my experience) tend to be a little confused
Thanks you so much tap. I appreciate the sincere comment. Although koi's are commonly used in tattoos, mine was only half complete in that picture and the entire thing was hand drawn by my artist and is quite unique.
I hardly ever comment on other peoples tattoos, I only do it when I see them being misspelled, I then ask the person where they got it done and if the illiterate artist charges less than 125 bucks an hour. Guess what the last fella told me, he said he got it done at Lady Luck and didn't notice it was misspelled till I asked him about it! They still charged him 125 bucks an hour! Holy shit people are fucking dumb as hell!
Kay b, just personal experience. I just don't like the "bad boy image". Maybe I just made poor choices (in terms of whom I dated...again, I am not a hooligan or "bad boy", neither am I a saint but I would prefer some one like me for me) @eww....stating the facts is merely that. If you want to take it that way, fine. And thank you! Of course you do not have an avatar of yourself. And are an angry person apparently. Such is life....wait, I thought this was about a lady and tattoo's?
@Showstopper: Understandable, but not everyone equates scars with being a "bad boy". It can just be an added character to the physical body that some find appealing.
I understand the word "notion". I don't understand what you mean by "That's not a good way to see it, but if that way is the only way you see it". I did not describe how I view scars, I only said that not everyone views them as evidence of a "bad boy" persona.
Perhaps I simply made poor choices regarding women...I am not the brightest and do have a little of a rescuer complex, so it could be that. Us guys that are "ugly as fuck" can't be too picky,lol. I find women with tattoos attractive more often that not as an aside
Maybe that is your main problem, usually only going for women with a mass amount of tattoos isn't a good thing. Not all of them are cool people to date, a lot of the ones I've met in Portland are stuck up pretentious bitches. And more more oftentimes then not fat, and I don't mean 10-20 pounds over weight, I mean 40-80 pounds overweight. The ones I meet that are not fat and have tons of tattoos are usually just wanting to talk only about themselves and if you stop for an instant in asking them questions about themselves, they no longer want anything to do with you. They pretend to wear their hearts on their sleeves, and even sometimes have such tattoos, but truly they are pretenders.
I also agree that it's totally weird that someone may be examining my body at the gym.
That post was so nice
They printed it twice
This is just basic locker room etiquette and had it been presented that way, without mention of the tattoos, I doubt anyone would have a problem with it.
What I posted was basic common sense and nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to think that I'm friends with the author, you go right ahead and keep believing that.