I'm not of all the particulars of this case...but if you removed someone's prosthesis, shouldn't that be a big deal? What if the protester removed a false arm and calmly gave it to the security guard? For someone who is totally blind without modern scientific intervention, it scares me to think that the abled would trivialize this kind of literally debilitating assault. I'm very glad its being taken seriously, and I question whether the writer of this article is viewing this charge through their lens of victimization for protestors, rather than fair treatment for the alternatively abled.

I am disabled and use a wheelchair to get around I also wear glasses and am blind without them. I would agree to trivalize these prosthetic items as just another belonging would be wrong. I do see why the glasses were taken because the man was assaulting people before hand.