That is the worst reporting I have ever read. Not only does the author inject their own personal political bias in to the discussion, the author failed to actually explain what the rule change is. If the reader is to make any sort of informed decision on the rule change, they need the specifics of the rule change. This article is nothing more than a bashing of the current administration that is presently in power. Is that what this paper is all about?
That is the worst reporting I have ever read. Not only does the author inject their own personal political bias in to the discussion, the author failed to actually explain what the rule change is. If the reader is to make any sort of informed decision on the rule change, they need the specifics of the rule change. This article is nothing more than a bashing of the current administration that is presently in power. Is that what this paper is all about?
I agree with Jacknife
Process System