Comments

1

"Just because there were 6,000 uses of force doesnā€™t mean that that was constitutional force or that there was anything legal with the force," says a member of the public who also hasnā€™t had the opportunity to investigate the few reports that were filed. "And most of that force hasnā€™t been reviewed so it would be irresponsible to categorize the level of force or the accuracy of the officersā€™ claims without some form of investigation and accounting.ā€


Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.