Comments

1
Here's an idea: cut back on the $0.25 of every city dollar that goes to urban renewal. It means more money for core city services, plus more money flowing back to the county, which is the jurisdiction which is supposed to provide health and social services in the first place.
2
I would counter that it is more of a Sophie's Choice than a Hobson's (or Hobbsian) Choice.
3
No, he meant "Hobbesian choices" - like he said. As in Thomas Hobbes. As in brutish, nasty and short.
4
MORE LIKE A HOBO'S CHOICE.
5
He actually meant to say "Corellian Choice." It was his way of preempting any bureau staffers that might try to tell him the odds.
6
I think he meant that Stumptown will now be Taster's Choice.
7
Cut social services, but keep the huge diversity bureaucracy? Makes perfect sense.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.