Comments

1
Is Mary Peveto a scientist?

Did you ask which environmental laws companies have to follow and how many?

Can you define 'toxic hotspot'?

Can you demonstrate detrimental health effects of these things?

Your naive assertions are that someone intentionally would harm their neighbors.


Fire crews and the company itself also already said what was in the cloud.

They have to make bicycle parts somewhere you know.
2
Thanks, assholes, for making me stand out in the cold for half an hour waiting for a goddamned bus this morning!
3
@D: You're right. Fuck the EPA and DEQ; we don't need any regulations! There's no way that these businesses would care more about their bottom lines than being good neighbours and not polluting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disast…
4
Not even my cynicism allows me to think there are people so driven by greed that they wish physical harm on innocents.

OK, maybe the teachers unions.
5
Hey, why the fuss. I'm sure this benevolent company will gladly compensate people who were exposed to the airborne toxic event without a fight. They didn't mean to hurt anyone, right?
6
D like a young blind mammal at the teat you're a sucker. You suck what's comfortable and know, know the painful world lies.

Here are questions for you D. From your computer desk can you see the street outside? How many televisions do you have in your home? When was the last time you read a book or kissed a woman goodbye?
7
Wow, three of the worst polluters in the nation are based here in the Portland metro area (and actually, all of them are Precision Castparts).
8
Hello D. Don't know who you are. I am Mary Peveto. I am not a scientist - I am a mother of three young girls. I am also a concerned citizen who lives next to a large regulated polluter. Health based science is not utilized for regulating polluters. If it were, lead for example, would be prohibited. But instead as reported by Cascadia Times (http://times.org/article/303):"Consider a young girl living at Northwest 24th Place, across the street from an ESCO plant. In the eight years since 2001 when ESCO started disclosing its lead emissions to the EPA, the company has emitted 613 pounds of lead.Lead emissions have been rising since 2001, and were 32 times greater in 2008 than in 2001.If ESCO continues emitting lead at the 2008 rate, our young girl, before reaching her 18th birthday, could be exposed to another half-ton of emissions."

ESCO is my neighbor. I also thought you might like to meet my other neighbor: Chris King Components (http://chrisking.com/). The company produces bike components. They do not pollute.

Kind regards, Mary
9
Get real, fools. The four people who went to the hospital went as a precaution.
The titanium pieces are immersed in the acid on purpose, they didn't slip in.

Noone at the company messed up and allowed the casing to fall in, the power went out when the piece was in, preventing the part from being removed.

Fact is, I worked at PCC until recently in thier facilities engineering department. Air quality and environmental protection is taken very seriously. The cost of many a project DOUBLED for a minor increase in air scrubber performance, among other things. The chemicals were quickly diluted by rain, and posed no threat to the public. This is just typical sensationalist news reporting.
10
I suspect the cloud you see on the Fremont is probably from the Widmer brewery. Why can't we lead the nation in alcohol based pollution?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.