if tax dollars cover the damages of police buildings, or if the damage of buildings make it affordable for outside investment companies to buy damaged properties with pennies from the local owners who can't sell their mom-and-pop-dream-shop (driving prices up, pushing regular folks out), aren't we just shooting ourselves in the foot instead of sticking it to the man? we are making it easier for the white man to fiscally steal out locals from our city and their insurance and our tax literally bails them out, like the reckless teenaged sons they are. just starting to wonder if there are better strategies.

by the way, what happened to the money donated to support Black families and causes? some traitor in the midst buying homes in Beverly Hills. we getting played. maybe we should stick to supporting local communities instead of brand name charities whose donated funds turn into mansions for one. smh.