I don't think it's a bad idea, but on the other hand, less homeless services in favor of attracting backpacker kids from far and wide (especially in a fairly crappy neighborhood) doesn't really strike me as something that's very "feasible" for the central city.
Explain why the future of this building is any of David Gold's business? He stood by idly while The Grove was a snakepit. Now that it's been tidied up with City dollars who's he to be advantaged?
I don't fully understand the intro to this piece. Are you saying that because they're not using RSS feeds, they're not regurgitating other reporters' work (because they're therefore finding enterprise stories on their own)? Are you complimenting them? Or busting on them for not using RSS feeds?