"nice" Dan Handleman. Nice.

who made this guy the spokesperson for popo watchdogging in this town?

I dont recall any election or appoinment process.

Seems like dan oughta get a new gig not pretending to care.

Question 9 boldly asks whether the IPR & CRC, which DoJ investigators termed Portland's 'self-defeating accountability system,' can be left intact and now deemed a "fair, reasonable, and adequate process by which citizens can ... have confidence that complaints will be
adequately investigated and resolved." Should political pressure be sufficient to replace police self-exoneration with truly independent oversight (dismantling the failed IPR), the City can claim this would trigger non-compliance with the Agreement.

Renaud's point on soft language, allowing the parties to walk away from delivery of health care to victims, reveals the need for multi-jurisdictional remedy. To leave cops in charge of assessment and delivery of care, with no back end to provide that care? That's a cul de sac where vulnerable people will contend with a criminal justice system, walled off from restorative remedy.