News Aug 11, 2011 at 4:00 am

Planned Parenthood Get Organized

Comments

1
Congrats to the employees.
Though, I wonder how the pricing will change for services, and could this put Planned Parenthood financially out of reach for those that need it most.
2
So Mr. Greenberg is already interfering with his employees' rights, even as he claims that they're free to do what they want. They're forcing him to lawyer up. They're forcing him to hold anti-union meetings. They're forcing him to distribute anti-union screeds. They're forcing him to limit services because lawyering up costs money. Guy sounds like a real shitbag.
3
....and the union doesn't have lawyers on the payroll?
Nobody has said a word about limiting services, from what I've read so far. But they will certainly be forced to raise prices.
I refuse to believe that someone who decided to make his living working for Planned Parenthood (a non-profit too, right?) is a shitbag, just on principle.
As the workers really didn't have clearly defined goals in joining the union, I hope they feel they get their monies worth. They are paying for it, as well as the many women who go there for help.
4
Not so good for the 43 people who voted no... Now they have to join a union they do not want to belong to and are forced to pay dues they cannot afford. Not to mention the rest of the PPCW employees that are not eligible to be in the union who will now have to deal with this new union regardless.

I have no doubt that SEIU is a good organization but PPCW is a non-profit organization and the wage increase freeze is due to republican attacks on women's healthcare and the loss of funding we have seen all around the country, as well as the economic downturn which has dropped the number of donations to PPCW.

SO while SEIU promises its new members wage increases to cover their new union dues we must stop to ask where this extra money is going to come from seeing as how most of their money is from donations. Seems to me it will ether land on the backs of all the non-union workers at PPCW or it will land on the low income clients at the check-out counter which is 180* opposite of PPCW’s mission in the first place.

Also David Greenberg has been very fair and understanding with all PPCW employees and even the very pushy SEIU. There has never been a reason for them to act that way as many in our community will testify to David's Kindness and accessibility. David has always been open to talk to any employee at anytime and these people are just upset he has to give them the same answer each time.

One last question, When the SEIU finds out that you really cannot get blood from a stone what will be their next move? Will they call a strike and send all those PPCW employees out to picket PPCW right next to all those people holding up gross mutilation signs while low income clients go without healthcare? Isn't that a bit dangerous? Will they trash PPCW in the media like they are doing already giving the anti-choice movement even more ammo to attack PPCW with?

This vote has the potential to tear PPCW right down the middle and I would say that the employee you mentioned in this post earlier would be glad to see it happen as she is very bitter and likes power games…
5
I'm a dyed in the wool liberal, and I was totally pro-union until my two completely negative experiences with two different unions. In my personal experience, the unions were only about collecting dues and bureaucracy, other than that they couldn't have cared less. I'm still very liberal, but I'm very skeptical about unions - in my view they just create stifling, unhappy workplaces.
6
"I'm still very liberal, but I'm very skeptical about unions - in my view they just create stifling, unhappy workplaces."

The alternative sure as Hell isn't any better.

But however this turns out, services to women should ABSOLUTELY NOT be fucked with!
7
i too worry about where the money will come from to pay for all things union. the staff who voted in the union certainly were hoping for more money; anyone who works in the health centers is not rolling in dough. i personally can't afford to pay the union dues and am concerned. i know PPCW doesn't have the money to pay us more, but PPCW will need a lawyer to consult around the upcoming union contract. We will likely need to keep a lawyer (or team of lawyers) on to make sure that the organization doesn't make any moves that would be in violation of that contract. Do you know what lawyers cost?! The state and federal government, insurance companies and patients are not going to magically come up with more money to reimburse PPCW for what we do. WHERE WILL IT COME FROM?
8
When PP built that fancy new building in NE, where did that money come from? The proverbial stone certainly bled then, didn't it? My sense is that the PP workers are forming a union not so much because of money but in order to have more of a voice in overall decision making, and that includes financial priorities.
9
First, a majority of patients seeking birth control services at PP have services funded through state programs. PP is the provider which receives the modest reimbursement for the services, so prices would not be raised. Of course, those not eligible for the state dollars may have to pay on PP's sliding fee scale, which for some services could go up, but it could have gone up anyway. I think it is far fetched to say that unionization would equal patients left out in the cold.

Second, PPCW's new building on MLK was paid for by donations and grants from what I gather. Of course, that doesn't mean that the organization isn't now burdened by the costs of running an additional and very large (and in my opinion a bit ostentatious) building.

@themekon: I think you hit it on the head when you said "financial priorities." PP employees certainly care about the organization and the mission more than money. But in cases of unionization in general, any company will say there is no money. It comes down to what those in power think money should go for versus those who are in the trenches.

Seriously, who could believe that over 70% of voting employees wanted to unionize for no real reason? Money? Yeah, a little I'm sure. Feeling that some some things need to change in order to preserve the strength and value of the organization? No doubt.

@Sweetz: You obviously represent the anti-union PP staff. Name calling ("bitter", "likes power games") of the employee interviewed in the article does not elicit sympathy for your side.

There is no reason to jump to the idea of a strike side by side with protestors, or that because employees wanted a union that thngs are horrid at PP, or that anyone is getting rich at PP, or that patients are going to be seriously affected. Maybe an actual reasonable agreement and contract can be ironed out quickly and things will actually IMPROVE. Things are always more complex, but often less sensational, than they appear on the surface.
10
For the record, all you apparently uneducated liberal Portlanders, being a "not-for-profit" doesn't mean you can treat your workers as you please. In fact, it actually means you should treat your employees BETTER than the private sector does. There are plenty of hospitals and schools that are unionized (not to mention much of our public sector), and if it costs more to the consumer, well, you get what you pay for in life, and if you dont' like it, go shell out $3 to $5 for a freakin' box of condoms and take charge of your own birth control. If PP doesn't want a union, do what any sensible company does, raise your wages, increase worker input, blah, blah, blah. In the end, the choice is row versus wade
11
In 2008, according to PP itself, Cecile Richards, the president, made more than $380,000 in salary and compensation. Let that sink in for a moment. This is a nonprofit organization that makes its top executives very wealthy. Meanwhile, Greenberg doesn't want his employees to unionize, all while PP cries poverty whenever the feds want to cut its funding. It's just another American institution designed to make a few people rich while everyone else foots the bill, and what's worse is people like Richards will be defended by the equally wealthy elite of the Democratic Party who, from free trade agreements and other actions, continue to sell out working class Americans. Can we not fall for this siren song next election? It's time to vote Working Families or Green or Socialist and not for this bunch of parasites.
12
Hats off to these workers! A union is a logical step in an effort to have an influence on a place where we spend most of our waking hours. It is the only kind of orgnization that gives workers any kind of power in the workplace. Just because PP is a "non-profit" does not mean it isn't run like any other business that depends on labor exploitation to turn a profit or "balance the budget". Onward to organizing other "non-profit" organizations!

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.