Comments

1
I was going to say... the press release left out the part where they smashed him in the nose.
2
For a more complete account of the events (plus accurate information surrounding the duplex) read on:

http://www.liberatepdx.org/?p=434

This is not a protest, this is a land dispute.
3
@K

Actually, the bank owns the property so you are a criminal and you are illegally squatting on the land. You should be ashamed of yourself for encouraging Alicia Jackson to descend to your level of lawlessness.
4
@implosivefarts actually, the bank has committed crime after crime but because they invest heavily in how your brain receives information, you've failed to notice.

Wake up and smell the revolution!!!!
5
WHAT EXACT CRIME HAS THE BANK COMMITTED IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE? THE ONLY DOCUMENTED CRIMES I'VE SEEN ARE BREAKING AND ENTERING.
6
Thanks for the picture of the real idiot Sarah.
7
It can be argued whether or not the bank actually owns any property for that matter. Since when banks invest money; they only actually invest 10% of their actual money when purchasing property; banks don't need to have all the money to purchase property right now. So it could be argued in court that the bank doesn't actually have the capitol to even own said property. Which it was argued that at one point; the man won the case; he was able to prove that a bank didn't own his house. HMM, this is why the banks needed a bail-out in the first place; they bought property without actually having the money to purchase it. They're still doing the same routine; even after going bankrupt.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.