Transportation Jul 19, 2011 at 2:46 pm

Comments

1
"And fare inspectors don't cover their own costs."

I think you're failing to take into account that a visible, reliable fare inspector presence probably acts to deter many of those who might otherwise risk getting on without buying a fare.
2
A fare inspector makes $67,000 per year??? I'm doing something wrong.
3
$67,000 is complete insanity.
4
I guess I'm going to look into being a Fare Inspector.
5
"A fare inspector makes $67,000 per year??? I'm doing something wrong. "

Sounds like a lot, especially if your making 10 bucks an hour. But 67k after taxes and social security and union dues etc etc is not as great as it sounds.

Macfarlane makes $244k, as a matter of fact there are plenty of people who make much more than 67k.

Which ones are most valuable to the public interest?

http://www.box.net/shared/cvndf2i7hi
6
Al, as someone that makes less than $67,000 a year after taxes and so on, it really is as great as it sounds. Checking fares requires no education, or particularly special abilities. Why can't they find people who will do it for $10/hr?
7
I wonder if they'd be more likely to issue citations if they were $50 instead of $175.
8
btw I agree that $67K is total insanity if that's the salary, and not Trimet's TOTAL cost per year for the employee, e.g. including all benefits, training costs, equipment etc.
9
Wow, our taxes are helping pay a fare inspector 67k? See if I ever vote pro-TriMet again.
10
Thanks for the shout, Sarah! For what it's worth, the $91.50 is based on the amount TriMet gets after splitting its $175 fine with the other agencies who have to push some of the paper in this situation. (County and state, I believe.)

Point is, TriMet really has few tools to force people to pay if they don't want to. It'll be interesting to see if they can find some.
11
It sounds like TriMet needs to renegotiate the pay for inspectors or start using non-union inspectors. As others have noted, that is a pretty excessive salary for an unskilled position (well, there's conflict management skills, but that's not so rare or hard to train someone in). Plenty of people would be willing and able to perform this job at $10-$20/hour, thus in this case the union is acting as a barrier to entry for other working adults.

The other issue is the low percentage of citations. Imagine if 75% of parking tickets were just warnings! The proper way to do this is to issue citations to everyone, with the knowledge that many people (especially those who can't really afford it) will not pay them. Most people will pay and the amount raised would be way more than TriMet is getting now. Just like with parking tickets, they can choose to be lenient on people who just have a couple outstanding fines, but aggressively go after those "scofflaws" with mounting numbers of tickets.

The other option is to just push the passes as much as possible and move to an honor system. Most people will still pay because it is the right thing to do. If fare enforcement is actually costing more than it is bringing in, it either needs to be reformed or done away with--otherwise what is the point?
12
It sounds like TriMet needs to renegotiate the pay for inspectors or start using non-union inspectors. As others have noted, that is a pretty excessive salary for an unskilled position (well, there's conflict management skills, but that's not so rare or hard to train someone in). Plenty of people would be willing and able to perform this job at $10-$20/hour, thus in this case the union is acting as a barrier to entry for other working adults.

The other issue is the low percentage of citations. Imagine if 75% of parking tickets were just warnings! The proper way to do this is to issue citations to everyone, with the knowledge that many people (especially those who can't really afford it) will not pay them. Most people will pay and the amount raised would be way more than TriMet is getting now. Just like with parking tickets, they can choose to be lenient on people who just have a couple outstanding fines, but aggressively go after those "scofflaws" with mounting numbers of tickets.

The other option is to just push the passes as much as possible and move to an honor system. Most people will still pay because it is the right thing to do. If fare enforcement is actually costing more than it is bringing in, it either needs to be reformed or done away with--otherwise what is the point?
13
What is the job situation for the security guards you see at, for example, the Green/Yellow terminus at PSU under? There's always personnel there, and they look trains over inside to make sure everyone got off and stuff. From what I can gather it doesn't seem they're TriMet supervisors but I could be mistaken. $400K a year is 6 guys at $67,000. If we paid $12/hr it would pay for more like 16 dedicated fare inspectors! Why the heck does a fare inspector need to know how to drive a bus or train?
14
WOW! $67k is a great salary for standing around, checking tickets, and going to court. An entry level Portland police officer only makes $43k and will take FOUR years to reach $67k salary level (PDF).

Comment #1 is correct, keeping troublemakers off the system is extremely important and maintains the value of transit. Also, don't you feel like an idiot paying to ride the MAX when there's no chance of fare enforcement?
15
The best thing I've ever heard a Tri-Met bus driver say was (just before some fare inspectors got on the bus): "Here come the spare infectors."
16
$175 is another tax on the poor who struggle to afford public transportation. Still, I wouldn't begrudge the people who have good paying public sector union jobs that are getting harder to find. Is everyone expected to be non-union and paid minimum wage these days? Where does the downward spiral end?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.