Update 5 PM: Jeff Cogen has confirmed—not to this paper, even though we were the first to raise these issues publicly, in a post Friday, and called Cogen about this last week and then repeatedly today—that Sonia Manhas joined him for a work trip earlier this year where he used county money to pay for a King Deluxe hotel room they used for a tryst.

Cogen claimed he couldn’t remember any other trips besides one shown in records in February 2012. He also wasn’t telling the truth when he said, through a county spokesman, that he wasn’t talking to the media about his affair. That statement came to me not long before he went on KGW to talk about his pain and give apologies.

Meanwhile, the four county commissioners, Loretta Smith, Diane McKeel, Judy Shiprack, and Deborah Kafoury, have just issued a statement saying they’ve asked for an outside investigation of Cogen’s actions.

“As a result of the county attorney’s initial inquiry, and after consulting with Multnomah County District Attorney Rod Underhill, we the Multnomah County commissioners will be asking for an outside investigation.

The investigation will seek to determine whether Jeff Cogen misused county funds or other county resources. Additionally, this investigation will seek to determine whether any county personnel rules were violated by Chair Cogen. we want to assure the people of Multnomah County that the chair’s actions are being thoroughly examined. This investigation will allow the county to continue moving forward in its mission—to serve the most vulnerable populations in our community.”

Update 7:20 PM: Never mind county law: Did Cogen break state law by spending close to $1,000 in county money on a hotel room he shared with his lover? (A hotel room two miles away from the one he’d initially booked at a cheaper rate and with less romantic accommodations. (His king deluxe room at the Loews Atlanta hotel has floor-to-ceiling windows and 19th- to 23rd-floor views to appreciate through those windows.)

ORS 244.040 is explicitly clear that government officials can’t use their station to enjoy financial perks. Like a free vacation with your sweetheart on the government’s dime.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a public official may not use or attempt to use official position or office to obtain financial gain or avoidance of financial detriment for the public official, a relative or member of the household of the public official, or any business with which the public official or a relative or member of the household of the public official is associated, if the financial gain or avoidance of financial detriment would not otherwise be available but for the public officials holding of the official position or office.

Original post, 2:24 PM: As the Mercury first pointed out Friday, Multnomah County Chair Jeff Cogen’s travel documents—part of the dumping of public documents following his admission he slept with a county health policy manager for nearly two years—included some odd notations for a trip he took to Atlanta earlier this spring.

This April, Cogen flew back to Atlanta for a different conference, but apparently without [Sonia] Manhas. His reports from that trip aren’t incriminating but are contextually interesting. He caused some consternation among staffers by checking a second suitcase when flying there and back, something he said was because he packed so many suits. But it was only scheduled for a three-day trip—and Cogen flew back a day early, also costing the county more money. He also insisted on getting a Deluxe King room with a king-size bed.

Now there are new questions about that trip, as I first noted on Twitter this morning. A review of Manhas’ calendar shows she was on vacation the same days Cogen was gone, April 9 through April 11. Maybe it’s a coincidence. But suddenly. Cogen using county money to check a second bag, upgrade his room, and change his flight itinerary—each one a move that required extra explanation, according to records—doesn’t seem as harmless.

Was Cogen alone throughout the trip? Did he spend county money on Manhas’ travel costs or on a room they used for a tryst? The timing falls within when Cogen said the two would still be seeing one another.

I called Cogen’s cell phone to ask about the synchronicity and also reached out through county spokesman David Austin.

Austin said Cogen relayed a message: “He told me he’s not going to talk about this issue with the media.”

We’ll update when that changes.

Update 3:30 PM: Cogen has changed his mind about talking “about this issue with the media”—or he wasn’t telling the truth when he had Austin tell me that a little after 2. KGW has posted still photos and quotes from a recently taped exclusive in-studio sit-down with Laural Porter. It’s airing at 4 pm today.

Denis C. Theriault is the Portland Mercury's News Editor. He writes stories about City Hall and the Portland Police Bureau, focusing on issues like homelessness, police oversight, insider politics, and...

10 replies on “UPDATED: Cogen Confirms 2013 Atlanta Trip with Manhas; Commissioners Request Outside Probe”

  1. I don’t understand why someone caught in something like this doesn’t just flat out lay all the cards on the table and instead waits for the press to point out inconsistencies/untruths that they have to respond to and do more damage control on.

    Oh, wait, I actually do understand. Liars are liars.

  2. And yeah, here comes a nice $50,000 to $75,000 bill to the county for whatever totally independent and impartial law firm they select for the outside investigation.

  3. What’s the actual price difference between the room he booked and the room he upgraded to? A couple hundred bucks? That would be the amount he actually bilked taxpayers out of, not the total amount of the fancier room. Oh right, plus an extra bag fee on an airplane for her bag.

    If this is the extent of hubris and corruption in Multnomah County, 2013, is it wrong that I still don’t give a shit?

  4. Let me be a little clearer: I also don’t give a shit what happens to Cogen – he acted like an idiot. All I’m saying is let’s not get all high and mighty about defrauding taxpayers and betraying sacred trusts and all that bullshit.

    I would bet that every last person reading this has stolen from an employer at one time or another, probably more recently than you would care to admit. Most people have expensed a questionable purchase, or asserted a questionable tax deduction. It’s all lying and cheating and stealing and betraying sacred trusts if we want to get silly about it, but it’s also status quo human behavior.

    This guy, very stupidly, appears to have stolen a couple hundred dollars while on a work trip. He also had a pretty pedestrian affair with someone who wasn’t a direct subordinate, but wasn’t far off. He’s walked about as close to the “you-should-resign” line as one can, and may now have crossed it, but let’s not get carried away overstating the moral blameworthiness of the conduct.

    Oh, and how many millions of dollars are shat away on stupid policies every year? Why does that so rarely get us as hot and bothered as a fucking free checked bag?

  5. How about we actually get all high and mighty when it comes to public officials for any indiscretion regarding the public trust or funds?

    While I’m on a box of soap, I’d also like lifetime driving bans for DUII offenses or excessive speed (number is debatable, I’d be ok with 20 mph over the limit to invoke the penalty).

    Then, we might get somewhere.

  6. “How about we actually get all high and mighty when it comes to public officials for any indiscretion regarding the public trust or funds?”

    How well did demanding nothing short of complete purity of priests work out for the Catholic Church again?

    You can accept that public officials are also people, or you can hold them to standards so high that no sane person would ever want to serve, but you can’t do both.

  7. I accept that public officials are people too. But there are lots of good people out there who wouldn’t abuse the position. If we weed out those that would, and, do, we’d be much better off as a society.

  8. For me, it all boils down to one thing: Manhas got promoted because she and Cogen were fucking. That doesn’t mean she’s not qualified, doesn’t mean she didn’t necessarily deserve the promotion. But it’s damn near impossible to argue their relationship didn’t result in her promotion considering …

    “Records show Manhas forwarded the posting to Cogen via email, accompanied only by a smiley face. Cogen responded with a smiley face of his own—which suggests the job posting was no surprise to either of them. Then, on July 10, Manhas applied for the job. She listed as one of her two references Cogen, the county’s highest-ranking official.

    The process was not as Cogen characterized it. Unusually for a position that pays six figures, the job was an internal posting, which meant Multnomah County employees only could apply. That immediately disqualified two of the five applicants. Of the remaining three candidates, two dropped out before the interview process. That left only Manhas in the running—she got the job and a 20 percent pay increase, to $98,517.”

    http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-2094…

    So a wink and a nod (via emoticon) and everyone drops out of the running, in a ultra-competitive Portland job market for an almost $100k a year job, and Cogen’s sex partner ends up with the gig. That’s terrible fucking behavior from anyone, let alone an elected official.

    That’s more than enough right there for Cogen to be removed from office. Everything else is inconsequential. I don’t see how that much is even debatable.

Comments are closed.