Following a months-long organizing effort, temporary food workers at the Oregon Zoo have voted to join a union.

Earlier today, the Oregon Employment Relations Board released the results of the zoo workersโ€™ union election. The vote in the mail-in election went like this: 61 in favor of representation, with 4 against.

This means the zoo’s temporary kitchen and service workers and caterers could soon be part of Laborersโ€™ International Union of North America Local 483, which has been organizing behind the scenes at the zoo since earlier this year. Metro, which operates the zoo, has until September 23 to file any objections to the vote. However, if Metroโ€™s stance over the last couple of months is any measure, it should be smooth sailing for the union.

Back in July when Local 483 first filed with the state for union representation, organizers told the Mercury that they expected opposition from Metroโ€”replete with bureaucratic entanglements and foot-dragging. They were wrong.

โ€œThe bureaucratic obstacles we outlined did not happen,โ€ says Local 483 representative Megan Hise. โ€œWeโ€™re pleasantly surprised, and right now weโ€™re feeling pretty good.โ€

Hise has reason to feel good. The added zoo temps are expected to grow her unionโ€™s Metro membership from 207 employees to about 350 employees. And, Hise says, she doesnโ€™t expect Metro to file an objection. Thatโ€™s largely because zoo workers have been pleading their case with Metro since the middle of summer. And it looks like Metro has listened.

In July, zoo temps argued for a union in front of Metroโ€™s seven-person elected council. Local 483 reps have also met privately with a handful of councilors and Metroโ€™s human resources department, according to Hise.

The case the workers pleaded was a litany of complaints against the zoo, including that employeesโ€™ wages were frozen and the zoo didnโ€™t offer them paid sick leave. As we reported, part-time Metro workers donโ€™t qualify for protection under Portlandโ€™s sick leave ordinance. Which, as some zoo employees told us, meant they work sick even while handling zoo goersโ€™ food.

Still, Local 483โ€™s final voter turnout wasnโ€™t as strong as union members might have hoped for.

According to the Oregon Employment Relations Boardโ€™s vote tally, the number of zoo temps eligible to vote in this election was 142. Yes, that means over half of the eligible voters didnโ€™t vote. Thatโ€™s nothing new for America politics perhaps, however back in July union organizer Toby Green told the Mercury 75 percent of eligible employeesโ€”then Green estimated them at 149; zoo workers are frequently laid off and rehiredโ€”had signed union cards.

Nonetheless zoo food temp and union enthusiast Matt Ellison told the Mercury he was pleased so many of his co-workers mailed in their votes.

โ€œWe got a pretty impressive turnout despite the fact it’s a by-mail election where people have to supply their own stamps,โ€ says Ellison.

โ€œAnd,โ€ he added in a deadpan sarcastic tone, โ€œwe have a whole bunch of young people [in the workforce] who have never seen an envelope and they still figured out what this strange paper contraption was for.โ€

Contract bargaining with Metro isnโ€™t expected for a couple of months.

2 replies on “Zoo Food Temps Vote Yes to Union Representation”

  1. frankieb: it stands a better chance of getting some problems solved than just doing nothing and waiting for Metro to fix things. In case you were unaware we’ve been on a pay-freeze for years without even a cost of living allowance (COLA) while the senior management keeps talking about all the financial records we’re breaking. We’re the people who actually make money at the zoo and we can’t afford to eat there (we don’t get a meal allowance, just 25% off food.McDonald’s offers 50% and is a for-profit company with food much less expensive than that at the zoo).

    So yeah, maybe it won’t “fix all out problems”, maybe you could let me know what would fix even some of our problems (other than the pat and completely idiotic suggestion of “go find work somewhere else” because giving up and moving on is such a great plan for the world, isn’t it?).

Comments are closed.