Friday at Slate Vanessa Vitiello argued that LGBT voters have a responsibility to vote for Republican candidates—like these three cocksuckers—because why?

You can’t have a healthy democracy without a minimum of two strong, functional political parties. In a country as diverse as ours, this means that both major parties need a variety of voices, and both of them need to appeal to more than just a single, ever-narrowing constituency. If the Republican Party continues to decline in relevancy, we’ll all suffer in the long term if we’re forced to default to a Democratic Party that doesn’t have to work at being better than the alternative.

The GOP doesn’t have to moderate its anti-LGBT policies or kick assholes like this out of the party or remove its tongue from Tony Perkins’ hateful ass. No, no, no: it’s our job to save the GOP from itself.

I don’t see why this argument—as fucking stupid as it is—applies just to LGBT voters. Aren’t Hispanic, black, female, and pro-choice voters also obligated to support the GOP for the exact same reason?

In addition to being a nationally syndicated sex advice columnist, the author of several books, and the host of the Savage Lovecast, Savage is “a deviant of the highest order” (Daily Caller)....

One reply on “Slate Insults the Intelligence of LGBT Voters”

Comments are closed.