Mayor Charlie Hales has issued a second statement this afternoon defending a settlement he signed wiping away discipline for a police captain who’d been punished in 2010 for putting up a shrine to Nazi-era German soldiers several years before and then again this year for retaliating against a former subordinate who’d accused him of harassment.
Hales argues he was told that the city would have lost a court fight against Kruger, who filed a tort claim in January over the harassment complaints and a senior police bureau official’s mockery of Kruger’s reputation as the city’s “Nazi cop.” Separately, the Oregonian this afternoon has reported that Hales told his colleagues on the city council that he wasn’t aware of all the details of the settlement when he signed it and that he was looking for a way to back out.
Not only has the police bureau agreed to wipe away Kruger’s discipline, with a two-week suspension paid back as vacation time, but Police Chief Mike Reese also agreed to write a complimentary letter about Kruger that would be inserted into his file instead.
Hales is promising, from now on, that major discipline decisions will be aired more widely among the city council before they move forward.
“Mayors often must make distasteful decisions for the good of the city. This is one of those times,” Hales wrote. “My signature does not mean I condone, in any way, the actions of Capt. Kruger in 1999.”
His full, and very long, statement is on the jump.
On Wednesday, the community learned the details of a settlement between Capt. Mark Kruger and the City of Portland.
Community reaction has been outrage. I hear that outrage and agree with much of the substance of it. The issues involved bring up very personal, long-standing feelings of hurt and anger. These issues awaken our values as a community, especially where it comes to the behavior we expect from our public servants.
I do not minimize these feelings. The community has every right to feel this way.
The Portland City Council shares these values, as well as frustrations with this situation.
As mayor, I signed the settlement agreement. I am not happy with this settlement. I wish it had turned out differently. But it did not, and I take full responsibility for signing the document, making it a binding legal agreement. Mayors often must make distasteful decisions for the good of the city. This is one of those times.
My signature does not mean I condone, in any way, the actions of Capt. Kruger in 1999. Instead, this complex settlement marks the end of multiple legal battles that have engulfed the city for more than a decade and involved four mayoral administrations. The constitutional issues present in the situation meant that past mayors were advised by counsel that the city might well have lost a court fight. I have been advised the same.
I’m not happy with the settlement. But I signed it. The final decision was mine.
Regarding the Portland Police and relationships with the community, we have implemented significant structural changes, including:
● The hiring of a more diverse workforce.
● Creation of a new discipline guide.
● Implementation of new rules of conduct regarding use of force.
● Implementation of officer performance evaluations.We also have pushed forward with the implementation of reforms negotiated after a Department of Justice investigation, even though a judge has not yet ruled on the issue. We did not wait for the judge, but are working with the DOJ, the Police Bureau, and others in Portland to improve the relationship between the Police Bureau and the community.
Here’s what we have not done, but will do: Create a better process by which the details of major, important disciplinary issues – regardless of which bureau – are flagged for the attention of the full City Council. Currently, this process involves the City Attorney, Human Resources, the city’s Risk Management, the bureau and a single commissioner, but does not always include a full discussion with the full City Council. That will change.
I and other members of the Portland City Council intend to address that process immediately.
But in regards to the legal issue between the city and Capt. Kruger: The outrage felt by the community is right and just.This case needs to be resolved. I take responsibility for ending the legal dispute about past performance, and for setting clear expectations for future performance in service to Portlanders.

Look personally I think once a nazi always a nazi, but this isn’t just about Kruger’s behavior in 1999. He publically retaliated against a subordinate who complained about very recent behavior. The city just paid out 50 grand to settle a lawsuit about his very RECENT behavior. The city should be looking into how to fire him not how to throw money at him.
So it’s over now. How about maybe releasing all of the taxpayer-funded written legal advice that drove this fucked up decision?
“I’m Charlie-Goebels-Hale, and this is outrageous behavior that I don’t condone (but will effectively wipe away any trace of said outrageous and illegal behavior from a permanent record, and then retroactively reimburse a person on what will ultimately be on the taxpayers dime). You know… because. Cops, man. I used to be the chief so I have a hard-on for all of ’em! Free passes for shitty, unprofessional and illegal behavior for any tin-badge-wearing choad!”
Worst. Mayor. Ever.
I sincerely hope someone knocks your fucking teeth in, Mayor Hales. You are the worst kind of politician… The kind that gives with one hand and gives us the bird with the other, while smiling nice and big for the camera.
Sieg Heil, much?
That odor you smell in the air in Portland is not from the Camas paper mill.
How is this man still a cop?
As creepy as making a shrine to any foriegn soldier seems, I’d be curious to know of the exact nature of these particular German soldiers, as not all were stone-cold Jew killers.
And, yeah – creepy – but when does a police officer lose his right to free speech?
So the city couldn’t win against Kruger. And they couldn’t win about the fellow officer who they just settled for $50,000 with for sexual discrimination brought on by blowing the whistle on Kruger.
Begs the question, just what is the city doing and “winning” at?